Neighborhood · Ranked #15,522 of 84,120 nationally

Pearl District Eviction Risk: Moderate , Tulsa

Tract 40143002301 · Tulsa County, OK · pop 2,761 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi

With a score of 4.9/10, tract 40143002301 in Pearl District in Tulsa ranks in the Moderate tier for landlord eviction risk. The tract is home to 2,761 residents. That is riskier than about 34% of US census tracts.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 52% of renter households, a severe level, and 22% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $895 a month while the average household earns $32,708 a year, roughly 33% of income at the averages. About 63% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score

5.7

Moderate

Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale

Household mix · 100 hh

Burdened renters 33% Stable renters 30% Owners 37%

Tract context

Occupied units1,146

Renter share63.0%

SVI overall0.85

Poverty rate34.5%

Median income$32,708

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Tulsa and the region

Centroid at 36.1538, -95.9689 · click any tract to drill in

Why Pearl District scores 5.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly

Local political climate

Inherited from Tulsa

4.0

Regional political climate

2024 county presidential margin

4.2

State political climate

Oklahoma legislature & governorship

1.5

Economic stress

34.5% poverty · this tract

8.6

Supply constraint

$895 rent vs county FMR

2.6

Rent control risk

Inherited from Tulsa

1.0

Eviction process difficulty

State law sets the calendar

2.5

Tenant organizing strength

Inherited from Tulsa

3.0

Housing court bias

Inherited from Tulsa

2.5

How Pearl District compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.

CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 85

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

89%Socioeconomic
61%Household composition
62%Racial/ethnic minority
80%Housing & transportation

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

0%Grade A
0%Grade B
34%Grade C
63%Grade D · redlined

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

26.8%Housing insecurity
20.8%Utility-shutoff threat
37.6%Food insecurity
35.8%SNAP enrollment
18.7%Transit barriers
22.3%No health insurance
23.2%Frequent mental distress
50.2%Any disability

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Pearl District

The score leans hardest on economic stress at 8.6/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Tulsa eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Tulsa County average of 4.1 and above the Oklahoma statewide average of 4.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

This tract overlaps land the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation redlined in the 1930s, a dominant grade of D ("Hazardous") across 63% of the tract. Redlining cut off mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class blocks, and those areas still tend to carry higher rent burden and eviction filings today.

In CDC survey modeling, about 26.8% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 20.8% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 40143002301

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 40143002301?

Census tract 40143002301 in the Pearl District neighborhood scores 5.7/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.

What is the average rent in tract 40143002301?

Median gross rent is $895/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 52% of renter households are cost-burdened.

What is the poverty rate in tract 40143002301?

34.5% of residents in tract 40143002301 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,761.

How socially vulnerable is tract 40143002301?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 85th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 89th, household 61th, minority 62th, housing 80th.

Is tract 40143002301 considered part of Pearl District?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 40143002301 fall within Pearl District (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).

What share of households in tract 40143002301 struggle to pay rent?

About 26.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 20.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.

How does tract 40143002301 compare to Tulsa overall?

Tract 40143002301 scores 5.7/10, higher than the parent city of Tulsa at 2.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Tulsa eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.

Was tract 40143002301 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 63% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.

Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Tulsa

Top eight tracts in Tulsa ranked by composite eviction-risk score.