Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #35,669 of 84,120 nationally

Pearl District Eviction Risk: Moderate , Tulsa

Tract 40143002301 · Tulsa County, OK · pop 2,761 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi

With a score of 4.8/10, tract 40143002301 in the Pearl District area of Tulsa, OK reads moderate for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 2,761. The clearest offset is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10.

Risk score
4.8
Moderate
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 33% Stable renters 30% Owners 37%
Tract context
Occupied units1,146
Renter share63.0%
SVI overall0.85
Poverty rate34.5%
Median income$32,708

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Pearl District
Moderate
Within parent city
71 th percentile
Rank, 71st percentileLowHigh
#41 of 140 tracts In Tulsa
Elevated
Within county
80 th percentile
Rank, 80th percentileLowHigh
#42 of 208 tracts In Tulsa County
High
Within state
92 th percentile
Rank, 92nd percentileLowHigh
#100 of 1,205 tracts In Oklahoma
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Tulsa and the region

Centroid at 36.1538, -95.9689 · click any tract to drill in

Why Pearl District scores 4.8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Tulsa
4.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.2
State political climate
Oklahoma legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
34.5% poverty · this tract
8.6
Supply constraint
$895 rent vs county FMR
2.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Tulsa
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Tulsa
3.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Tulsa
2.5

How Pearl District compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Pearl District risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.84.8This tracttract 002301Tulsa: 3.43.4Tulsaparent cityCounty: 3.73.7Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.83.8Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 85

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Pearl District

52% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, well above the Tulsa County average of 40.3%. The poverty rate is 35%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment.

Running hot, economic stress reads 8.6/10. 22% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.

Set annual rent against average income of $32,708 and the ratio lands at 33%, above the conventional 30% ceiling. Well under the midpoint, state political climate reads 1.5/10.

Housing insecurity runs 26.8% against 14.2% nationally. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 20.8% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. It sits 1.1 points above the Tulsa County average of 3.7.

At $895 a month, rents run 15% under what the rest of Tulsa commands. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. Nationally it ranks #35,669 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 40143002301

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 40143002301?

Census tract 40143002301 in the Pearl District neighborhood scores 4.8/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 40143002301?

Median gross rent is $895/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 52% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 40143002301?

34.5% of residents in tract 40143002301 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,761.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 40143002301?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 85th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 89th, household 61th, minority 62th, housing 80th.
Q5

Is tract 40143002301 considered part of Pearl District?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 40143002301 fall within Pearl District (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 40143002301 struggle to pay rent?

About 26.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 20.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 40143002301 compare to Tulsa overall?

Tract 40143002301 scores 4.8/10, higher than the parent city of Tulsa at 3.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Tulsa eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 40143002301 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 63% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Tulsa

Top eight tracts in Tulsa ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related