Skip to content
Neighborhood · Tulsa, OK

Regency Park Eviction Risk: Moderate

1 census tracts · pop 2,060 · pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score 4.5/10 · range 4.5–4.5

Regency Park maps to a single census tract in Tulsa, OK, population 2,060. That produces an Eviction Risk Score of 4.5/10, Moderate tier. The clearest offset is rent-regulation exposure, at 1/10.

The severe-burden share is 25%. Those renters are past the 50% mark, and they miss rent for reasons that have nothing to do with willingness to pay. Against a Tulsa baseline of 29.0%, 39% of renters here cross the 30%-of-income line.

Well under the midpoint is eviction-process difficulty, at 2.5/10. The poverty rate is 19%, which shows up in this model as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment.

Running cool is housing-court posture, at 2.5/10. 14.8% of adults report being unable to pay a utility bill, against a 9.2% national figure. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two.

Food insecurity affects 26.6% of adults, 8.8 points above the national rate. Average gross rent is $1,152, 10% above the Tulsa average of $1,052. That places it #48 of 117 neighborhoods in Tulsa.

The closest comparables inside the same city are West O' Main and Mayo Plaza. Annual rent works out to 30% of average household income of $46,447.

One tract means one number: 4.5/10 applies directly to any address inside the boundary. Scores move when the ACS release, the court-record feed, or the statute ledger behind them moves.

Risk score
4.5
Moderate
1 tracts · population-weighted
Regency Park vs Tulsa How this neighborhood stacks against the citywide average
% of income on rent
38.9% +34%
Tulsa: 29.0%
Average gross rent
$1,152 +10%
Tulsa: $1,052
Average HH income
$46,447 -20%
Tulsa: $58,407
Poverty rate
19.2% +3%
Tulsa: 18.6%
Renter share
34.8% -28%
Tulsa: 48.1%
Peer neighborhoods

Neighborhoods with similar eviction risk

Same county, closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Regency Park and the region

Click any tract to drill in · 1 tracts span score 4.5–4.5

Why Regency Park scores 4.5

9 axes · pop-weighted · 1 = landlord-friendly
State political climate
legislature & governorship · Range 1.5–1.5 across tracts
1.5
Regional political climate
County-level mix · 2024 presidential margin · Range 4.2–4.2 across tracts
4.2
Local political climate
Parent city governance · Range 4.0–4.0 across tracts
4.0
Rent control risk
39% of income on rent · Range 1.0–1.0 across tracts
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State notice requirements & court backlog · Range 2.5–2.5 across tracts
2.5
Tenant organizing strength
35% renter households · Range 3.0–3.0 across tracts
3.0
Housing court bias
County bench composition · Range 2.5–2.5 across tracts
2.5
Economic stress
19.2% below poverty line · Range 4.8–4.8 across tracts
4.8
Supply constraint
Rent-to-FMR gap & zoning friction · Range 4.8–4.8 across tracts
4.8
Risk score comparison

Regency Park vs. parent city, state, U.S.

Eviction Risk Score (0–10 scale).

Regency Park score vs. parent city, state, U.S.Regency Park: 4.54.5Regency ParkNeighborhoodParent city: 3.43.4Parent cityhost cityState: 3.53.5Stateavg in stateU.S.: 5.15.1U.S.national avgU.S. avg = 5.0
Census tracts

1 tracts in Regency Park

Ranked highest-risk first. Click for per-tract detail.

Tract Score Pop % over 30% on rent Average rent
40143006906 4.5 2,060 39% $1,152
Social Vulnerability Index

CDC SVI percentile: 70

Pop-weighted across 1 tracts. Higher = more vulnerable to disaster, displacement, and rent shocks. Source: CDC/ATSDR SVI 2022.

Socioeconomic status 69%ile
Poverty, unemployment, no-HS-diploma, housing cost burden
Household characteristics 98%ile
Single-parent HH, disability, language barriers, age 17- / 65+
Racial/ethnic minority 73%ile
Hispanic + non-white share of population
Housing & transport 19%ile
Multi-unit structures, mobile homes, crowding, no vehicle
CDC PLACES 2023 · pop-weighted

Eviction-adjacent indicators in Regency Park

Average across all constituent tracts, population-weighted. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh) crude prevalence.

Frequently asked

About Regency Park

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for Regency Park?

Regency Park scores 4.5/10 (Moderate tier) across 1 census tracts. The pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income and poverty signals.
Q2

How does Regency Park compare to Tulsa overall?

Regency Park scores 1.1 points higher than Tulsa overall (3.4/10). Renters spend 39% of income on rent vs 29% citywide. Average rent: $1,152 vs $1,052.
Q3

What is the average rent in Regency Park?

Average gross rent in Regency Park is $1,152/month (pop-weighted across 1 census tracts, ACS 5-year 2023). 39% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q4

What percentage of Regency Park residents are renters?

35% of Regency Park households are renter-occupied (vs 48% in Tulsa). The neighborhood has 2,060 residents.
Q5

Is Regency Park a high social-vulnerability area?

Regency Park sits in the 70th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index (moderately vulnerable). The index combines poverty, unemployment, household composition, racial/ethnic minority share, and housing/transportation factors across all US census tracts.
Q6

How safe is Regency Park for landlords?

Regency Park carries a moderate-tier eviction-risk profile for landlords (4.5/10). Pop-weighted across 1 constituent tracts, the score blends parent-city rent-control posture, county eviction-process timelines, and tract-specific rent-to-income / poverty signals. Compared to Tulsa as a whole (3.4/10), this neighborhood is higher-risk.
Q7

What is the demographic breakdown of Regency Park?

Regency Park has 1,723 residents. Top groups: White (non-Hispanic) (38.4%), Hispanic / Latino (29.3%), Other / Multiracial (13.9%). Source: ACS 5-year 2023, table B03002.
Nearby

Other neighborhoods near Regency Park

Sibling neighborhoods

Other neighborhoods inside Tulsa

Same parent city, ranked by score similarity to Regency Park.

Zoom out

Up the geography chain · or explore further