Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #59,654 of 84,120 nationally

Renaissance Eviction Risk: Lower , Tulsa

Tract 40143003500 · Tulsa County, OK · pop 2,111 · neighborhood within 0.0 mi

With a score of 3.4/10, tract 40143003500 in the Renaissance area of Tulsa, OK reads lower for landlord eviction risk. It is home to 2,111 residents. about a quarter of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, markedly below the Tulsa County average of 40.3%.

Risk score
3.4
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 11% Stable renters 31% Owners 58%
Tract context
Occupied units1,034
Renter share42.6%
SVI overall0.10
Poverty rate12.8%
Median income$70,769

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Renaissance
Very Low
Within parent city
36 th percentile
Rank, 36th percentileLowHigh
#90 of 140 tracts In Tulsa
Low
Within county
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#105 of 208 tracts In Tulsa County
Moderate
Within state
46 th percentile
Rank, 46th percentileLowHigh
#655 of 1,205 tracts In Oklahoma
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Tulsa and the region

Centroid at 36.1442, -95.9493 · click any tract to drill in

Why Renaissance scores 3.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Tulsa
4.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.2
State political climate
Oklahoma legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
12.8% poverty · this tract
3.2
Supply constraint
$1,288 rent vs county FMR
5.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Tulsa
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Tulsa
3.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Tulsa
2.5

How Renaissance compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Renaissance risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.43.4This tracttract 003500Tulsa: 3.43.4Tulsaparent cityCounty: 3.73.7Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.83.8Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 10

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Renaissance. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Renaissance

The clearest offset is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10. On the softer side, state political climate reads 1.5/10. Average gross rent is $1,288, 22% above the Tulsa average.

12% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. Well under the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 2.5/10.

SNAP participation runs 7.8% against 15.2% nationally. Food insecurity runs 10.5% against 17.8% nationally.

This ground was mapped B ("Still Desirable") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Tulsa. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. Nationally it ranks #59,654 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 1.9/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.

Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured. It tracks the Tulsa County average of 3.7 closely.

Annual rent works out to 22% of average household income of $70,769.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 40143003500

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 40143003500?

Census tract 40143003500 in the Renaissance neighborhood scores 3.4/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 40143003500?

Median gross rent is $1,288/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 27% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 40143003500?

12.8% of residents in tract 40143003500 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,111.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 40143003500?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 10th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 35th, household 4th, minority 47th, housing 9th.
Q5

Is tract 40143003500 considered part of Renaissance?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 40143003500 fall within Renaissance (neighborhood centroid within 0.0 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 40143003500 struggle to pay rent?

About 9.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 40143003500 compare to Tulsa overall?

Tract 40143003500 scores 3.4/10, right in line with the parent city of Tulsa at 3.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Tulsa eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 40143003500 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Tulsa

Top eight tracts in Tulsa ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related