Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally

Sonoma-Louisville Eviction Risk: Lower , Tulsa

Tract 40143004101 · Tulsa County, OK · pop 2,484 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi

40143004101 is a census tract in the Sonoma-Louisville area of Tulsa, OK. It scores 3/10 for landlords. It is home to 2,484 residents. 43% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.

Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 3% Stable renters 1% Owners 96%
Tract context
Occupied units1,090
Renter share3.4%
SVI overall0.00
Poverty rate3.0%
Median income$242,143

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Sonoma-Louisville
Very Low
Within parent city
13 th percentile
Rank, 13th percentileLowHigh
#122 of 140 tracts In Tulsa
Very Low
Within county
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#140 of 208 tracts In Tulsa County
Low
Within state
35 th percentile
Rank, 35th percentileLowHigh
#781 of 1,205 tracts In Oklahoma
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Tulsa and the region

Centroid at 36.1116, -95.9492 · click any tract to drill in

Why Sonoma-Louisville scores 3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Tulsa
4.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.2
State political climate
Oklahoma legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
3.0% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,809 rent vs county FMR
10.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Tulsa
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Tulsa
3.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Tulsa
2.5

How Sonoma-Louisville compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Sonoma-Louisville risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.03.0This tracttract 004101Tulsa: 3.43.4Tulsaparent cityCounty: 3.73.7Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.83.8Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 0

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: A: Best

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade A meant wealthy, predominantly white neighborhoods favored for lending. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Sonoma-Louisville. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Sonoma-Louisville

78% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, well clear of the Tulsa County average of 40.3%. The score leans hardest on supply constraint at 10/10. Average gross rent is $1,809, 72% above the Tulsa average.

The voucher gap is 53.4%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. Running cool, rent-regulation exposure reads 1/10.

On the softer side, economic stress reads 1/10. SNAP participation runs 3.3% against 15.2% nationally. Adults with no health insurance runs 3.7% against 11.3% nationally.

It sits 0.7 points below the Tulsa County average of 3.7. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground A ("Best"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. That is riskier than roughly 20% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.

Only 3% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. Social vulnerability reads 1/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 40143004101

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 40143004101?

Census tract 40143004101 in the Sonoma-Louisville neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 40143004101?

Median gross rent is $1,809/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 78% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 40143004101?

3.0% of residents in tract 40143004101 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,484.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 40143004101?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 0th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 1th, household 8th, minority 16th, housing 1th.
Q5

Is tract 40143004101 considered part of Sonoma-Louisville?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 40143004101 fall within Sonoma-Louisville (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 40143004101 struggle to pay rent?

About 4.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 40143004101 compare to Tulsa overall?

Tract 40143004101 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Tulsa at 3.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Tulsa eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 40143004101 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of A. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Tulsa

Top eight tracts in Tulsa ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related