Neighborhood · Ranked #73,892 of 84,120 nationally

Sonoma-Louisville Eviction Risk: Lower , Tulsa

Tract 40143004101 · Tulsa County, OK · pop 2,484 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi

Census tract 40143004101 sits in the Sonoma-Louisville area of Tulsa eviction risk, Oklahoma eviction laws, and carries an eviction-risk score of 4.3/10. That is riskier than about 17% of US census tracts.

78% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 43% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,809 a month while the average household earns $242,143 a year, roughly 9% of income at the averages. Renters make up 3% of occupied homes.

Risk score

Lower

Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale

Household mix · 100 hh

Burdened renters 3% Stable renters 1% Owners 96%

Tract context

Occupied units1,090

Renter share3.4%

SVI overall0.00

Poverty rate3.0%

Median income$242,143

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Tulsa and the region

Centroid at 36.1116, -95.9492 · click any tract to drill in

Why Sonoma-Louisville scores 2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly

Local political climate

Inherited from Tulsa

4.0

Regional political climate

2024 county presidential margin

4.2

State political climate

Oklahoma legislature & governorship

1.5

Economic stress

3.0% poverty · this tract

1.0

Supply constraint

$1,809 rent vs county FMR

10.0

Rent control risk

Inherited from Tulsa

1.0

Eviction process difficulty

State law sets the calendar

2.5

Tenant organizing strength

Inherited from Tulsa

3.0

Housing court bias

Inherited from Tulsa

2.5

How Sonoma-Louisville compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.

CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 0

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

1%Socioeconomic
8%Household composition
16%Racial/ethnic minority
1%Housing & transportation

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: A: Best

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade A meant wealthy, predominantly white neighborhoods favored for lending. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

38%Grade A
0%Grade B
0%Grade C
0%Grade D · redlined

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Sonoma-Louisville. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

4.7%Housing insecurity
3.7%Utility-shutoff threat
4.9%Food insecurity
3.3%SNAP enrollment
3.4%Transit barriers
3.7%No health insurance
11.6%Frequent mental distress
27.3%Any disability

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Sonoma-Louisville

The heaviest input here is supply constraint at $1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Tulsa eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Tulsa County average of 4.1 and in line with the Oklahoma statewide average of 4.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 4.7% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 3.7% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

HOLC surveyors mapped this tract in the 1930s with a dominant grade of A ("Best"), above the redlined D tier. The grading still shaped decades of lending and development in the surrounding area.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 40143004101

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 40143004101?

Census tract 40143004101 in the Sonoma-Louisville neighborhood scores 2/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.

What is the average rent in tract 40143004101?

Median gross rent is $1,809/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 78% of renter households are cost-burdened.

What is the poverty rate in tract 40143004101?

3.0% of residents in tract 40143004101 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,484.

How socially vulnerable is tract 40143004101?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 0th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 1th, household 8th, minority 16th, housing 1th.

Is tract 40143004101 considered part of Sonoma-Louisville?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 40143004101 fall within Sonoma-Louisville (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).

What share of households in tract 40143004101 struggle to pay rent?

About 4.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.

How does tract 40143004101 compare to Tulsa overall?

Tract 40143004101 scores 2/10, lower than the parent city of Tulsa at 2.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Tulsa eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.

Was tract 40143004101 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of A. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.

Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Tulsa

Top eight tracts in Tulsa ranked by composite eviction-risk score.