Western Village Eviction Risk: Moderate

Against a Tulsa baseline of 29.0%, 19% of renters here cross the 30%-of-income line. The poverty rate is 27%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than the filing statistics suggest.

The severe-burden share is 15%. Those renters are past the 50% mark, and they miss rent for reasons that have nothing to do with willingness to pay. Disability prevalence reaches 47.1% against a 31.5% national average, which raises the odds a reasonable-accommodation request accompanies any dispute.

On the softer side is eviction-process difficulty, at 2.5/10. Well under the midpoint is housing-court posture, at 2.5/10. At $1,221 a month, rents sit 16% over what the rest of Tulsa commands.

15.3% of adults report being unable to pay a utility bill, against a 9.2% national figure. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. That places it #43 of 117 neighborhoods in Tulsa. At 22% renter-occupied, this is predominantly owner territory, and rental comps have to be drawn from further out.

The closest comparables inside the same city are Mid-Town Village and Burning Tree. Social vulnerability runs high at 8.5/10, concentrating the disaster- and displacement-exposure this model treats as a lagging risk input.

Because the boundary contains one tract, 4.7/10 is simultaneously the area figure and the address-level figure. The number is rebuilt whenever its ACS, court-record, or statutory inputs change.