Burning Tree Eviction Risk: Moderate
1 census tracts · pop 3,527 · pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score 4.7/10 · range 4.7–4.7
Burning Tree maps to a single census tract in Tulsa, OK, population 3,527. Scored across those inputs it reaches 4.7/10, placing it in the Moderate tier. 54% of renters here are cost-burdened at the 30% threshold, dramatically above the Tulsa rate of 29.0%.
Pulling the other way is rent-regulation exposure, at 1/10. 79% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building two streets over. The severe-burden share is 21%. Those renters are past the 50% mark, and they miss rent for reasons that have nothing to do with willingness to pay.
Well under the midpoint is eviction-process difficulty, at 2.5/10. Disability prevalence reaches 45.8% against a 31.5% national average, which raises the odds a reasonable-accommodation request accompanies any dispute.
The poverty rate is 19%, which shows up in this model as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment. On the softer side is housing-court posture, at 2.5/10. That places it #43 of 117 neighborhoods in Tulsa.
For a like-for-like read, Mid-Town Village and Western Village score within a fraction of it. Social vulnerability runs high at 9.2/10, concentrating the disaster- and displacement-exposure this model treats as a lagging risk input. Average gross rent runs $1,064, close to the Tulsa average.
Annual rent works out to 29% of average household income of $43,750.
One tract means one number: 4.7/10 applies directly to any address inside the boundary. The number is rebuilt whenever its ACS, court-record, or statutory inputs change.
Neighborhoods with similar eviction risk
Same county, closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Risk heat across Burning Tree and the region
Click any tract to drill in · 1 tracts span score 4.7–4.7
Why Burning Tree scores 4.7
9 axes · pop-weighted · 1 = landlord-friendlyBurning Tree vs. parent city, state, U.S.
Eviction Risk Score (0–10 scale).
1 tracts in Burning Tree
Ranked highest-risk first. Click for per-tract detail.
| Tract↕ | Score↕ | Pop↕ | % over 30% on rent↕ | Average rent↕ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 40143007617 | 4.7 | 3,527 | 54% | $1,064 |
CDC SVI percentile: 91
Pop-weighted across 1 tracts. Higher = more vulnerable to disaster, displacement, and rent shocks. Source: CDC/ATSDR SVI 2022.
Eviction-adjacent indicators in Burning Tree
Average across all constituent tracts, population-weighted. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh) crude prevalence.
- 18.2%Housing insecurity
- 14.0%Utility shutoff threat
- 24.4%Food insecurity
- 21.7%SNAP enrollment
- 14.8%No health insurance
- 45.8%Any disability
About Burning Tree
How does Burning Tree compare to Tulsa overall?
What is the average rent in Burning Tree?
What percentage of Burning Tree residents are renters?
Is Burning Tree a high social-vulnerability area?
How safe is Burning Tree for landlords?
What is the demographic breakdown of Burning Tree?
Other neighborhoods near Burning Tree
Other neighborhoods inside Tulsa
Same parent city, ranked by score similarity to Burning Tree.