Woodrow Park Eviction Risk: Moderate

The severe-burden share is 37%. Those renters are past the 50% mark, and they miss rent for reasons that have nothing to do with willingness to pay. The strongest single driver of the headline number is economic stress at 10/10.

The poverty rate is 44%, which shows up in this model as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment. CDC survey data puts housing insecurity at 35.2% of adults, against 14.2% nationally. On the softer side is rent-regulation exposure, at 1/10.

At $723 a month, rents sit 31% under what the rest of Tulsa commands. Annualized rent equals 33% of average household income here, past the 30% affordability line, which compresses the margin any screening standard has to work with. Well under the midpoint is supply constraint, at 1.1/10.

This is a renter market: 65% of occupied units are tenant-occupied. 17.3% of adults carry no health insurance against 11.3% nationally, a common route into sudden unpayable debt. That places it #1 of 117 neighborhoods in Tulsa.

For a like-for-like read, Hope Valley and Riverside South score within a fraction of it. Social vulnerability runs high at 9.5/10, concentrating the disaster- and displacement-exposure this model treats as a lagging risk input.

Because the boundary contains one tract, 4.8/10 is simultaneously the area figure and the address-level figure. The number is rebuilt whenever its ACS, court-record, or statutory inputs change.