Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #56,660 of 84,120 nationally

Canby Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 41005022906 · Clackamas County, OR · pop 3,368 · 86% of tract blocks fall in Canby

How risky is Canby for landlords? Census tract 41005022906 scores 5.5/10, the Moderate tier. That is riskier than roughly 56% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 56% of renter households, a severe level, and 30% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $833 a month while the average household earns $73,750 a year, roughly 14% of income at the averages. Renters make up 30% of occupied homes.

Risk score
3.1
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 17% Stable renters 13% Owners 70%
Tract context
Occupied units1,262
Renter share30.3%
SVI overall0.83
Poverty rate4.7%
Median income$73,750

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
75 th percentile
Rank, 75th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 5 tracts In Canby
High
Within county
51 th percentile
Rank, 51st percentileLowHigh
#43 of 87 tracts In Clackamas County
Moderate
Within state
16 th percentile
Rank, 16th percentileLowHigh
#832 of 994 tracts In Oregon
Very Low
National
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#56,660 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Canby and the region

Centroid at 45.2515, -122.7009 · click any tract to drill in

Why Canby scores 3.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Canby
5.6
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.6
State political climate
Oregon legislature & governorship
7.2
Economic stress
4.7% poverty · this tract
1.2
Supply constraint
$833 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Canby
5.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Canby
6.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Canby
4.7

How Canby compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Canby risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.13.1This tracttract 022906Canby: 6.36.3Canbyparent cityCounty: 3.13.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.74.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 83

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 51Total filings over 6 yrs
  • 1.97%Avg annual filing rate
  • 3.1%Peak (2008)
  • 8Filings in 2013 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2007 to 2013
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 410050229062007: 8 filings (1.63/100 renter HHs)2008: 15 filings (3.05/100 renter HHs)2009: 13 filings (2.65/100 renter HHs)2010: 2 filings (0.44/100 renter HHs)2012: 5 filings (1.55/100 renter HHs)2013: 8 filings (2.48/100 renter HHs)
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 6 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Canby

The heaviest input here is eviction process difficulty at 6.7/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Canby eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Clackamas County average of 5.8 and below the Oregon statewide average of 6.0. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 51 eviction filings here over 6 tracked years, with about 2.0% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 3.1% of renter households in 2008.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 83rd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 41005022906

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 41005022906?

Census tract 41005022906 in Canby scores 3.1/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 41005022906?

Median gross rent is $833/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 56% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 41005022906?

4.7% of residents in tract 41005022906 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,368.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 41005022906?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 83th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 66th, household 70th, minority 32th, housing 99th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 41005022906?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 51 eviction filings across 6 validated years in tract 41005022906 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.97% of renter households, peaking at 3.1% in 2008. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

How does tract 41005022906 compare to Canby overall?

Tract 41005022906 scores 3.1/10, lower than the parent city of Canby at 6.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Canby eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Canby

Top eight tracts in Canby ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related