Within neighborhood
0
th percentile
Very Low
Neighborhood · Ranked #28,095 of 84,120 nationally
Corliss Eviction Risk: Moderate , Ingram
Tract 42003464300 · Allegheny County, PA · pop 3,351 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi
Tract 42003464300 sits in the Corliss area of Ingram, PA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 5.3/10. Population here is 3,351. 31% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.
Risk score
5.3
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 19%
Stable renters 23%
Owners 58%
Tract context
Occupied units1,608
Renter share42.6%
SVI overall0.29
Poverty rate15.8%
Median income$66,375
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Within county
56
th percentile
Elevated
Within state
70
th percentile
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Ingram and the region
Centroid at 40.4448, -80.0685 · click any tract to drill in
Why Corliss scores 5.3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Ingram
6.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.0
State political climate
Pennsylvania legislature & governorship
3.4
Economic stress
15.8% poverty · this tract
3.9
Supply constraint
$866 rent vs county FMR
1.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Ingram
6.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Ingram
8.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Ingram
6.7
How Corliss compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 29
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 28%Socioeconomic
- 48%Household composition
- 28%Racial/ethnic minority
- 32%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 93%Grade B
- 7%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 168Total filings over 7 yrs
- 4.48%Avg annual filing rate
- 6.6%Peak (2006)
- 35Filings in 2006 (latest validated)
Filings climbed 67% over the past 7 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Corliss. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Corliss
The score leans hardest on tenant-organizing strength at 8.5/10. On the softer side, supply constraint reads 1.8/10.
On the high side, court filing pressure reads 7.8/10. The filing record is not thin: 168 evictions over 7 years of observation.
45% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, higher than the Allegheny County average of 40.6%. Filings peaked in 2006 at 6.6% of renter households.
This ground was mapped B ("Still Desirable") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Pittsburgh. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. In a typical year about 4.5% of renter households face a filing.
On the national scale it lands near the 67th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 3.6/10.
Against average income of $66,375, annual rent is just 16%. It tracks the Allegheny County average of 5.0 closely.
Average gross rent is $866, close to the Ingram average. 43% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 42003464300
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 42003464300?
Census tract 42003464300 in the Corliss neighborhood scores 5.3/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 42003464300?
Median gross rent is $866/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 45% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 42003464300?
15.8% of residents in tract 42003464300 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,351.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 42003464300?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 29th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 28th, household 48th, minority 28th, housing 32th.
Q5
Is tract 42003464300 considered part of Corliss?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 42003464300 fall within Corliss (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 42003464300?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 168 eviction filings across 7 validated years in tract 42003464300 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 4.48% of renter households, peaking at 6.6% in 2006. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
How does tract 42003464300 compare to Ingram overall?
Tract 42003464300 scores 5.3/10, higher than the parent city of Ingram at 4.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Ingram; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8
Was tract 42003464300 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Related