Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #57,812 of 84,120 nationally

Tract 42003429300 Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 42003429300 · Allegheny County, PA · pop 6,533

Tract 42003429300 sits in Allegheny County, PA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 3.5/10. Population here is 6,533. Against Allegheny County at 40.6%, 56% of renters here are cost-burdened.

Risk score
3.5
Lower
Confidence 80% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 12% Stable renters 9% Owners 79%
Tract context
Occupied units2,765
Renter share21.3%
SVI overall0.20
Poverty rate6.4%
Median income$90,898

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within county
28 th percentile
Rank, 28th percentileLowHigh
#285 of 394 tracts In Allegheny County
Low
Within state
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#2,304 of 3,445 tracts In Pennsylvania
Low
National
31 th percentile
Rank, 31st percentileLowHigh
#57,812 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Allegheny County and the region

Centroid at 40.5368, -80.0506 · click any tract to drill in

Why Tract 42003429300 scores 3.5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
State baseline
3.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.0
State political climate
Pennsylvania legislature & governorship
3.4
Economic stress
6.4% poverty · this tract
1.6
Supply constraint
$1,092 rent vs county FMR
3.5
Rent control risk
State baseline
3.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.0
Tenant organizing strength
State baseline
4.0
Housing court bias
State baseline
5.0

How Tract 42003429300 compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Tract 42003429300 risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.5This tracttract 4293005.0Countyavg tract in county4.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 20

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 23Total filings over 7 yrs
  • 0.69%Avg annual filing rate
  • 0.9%Peak (2001)
  • 3Filings in 2006 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2006
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 42003429300
Filings dropped 25% over the past 7 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Tract 42003429300

The clearest offset is economic stress at 1.6/10. The severe-burden share is 23%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.

It sits 1.5 points below the Allegheny County average of 5.0. Running hot, court filing pressure reads 7.8/10.

Court records carry 23 eviction filings across 7 observed years. Filings peaked in 2001 at 0.9% of renter households. This ground was mapped B ("Still Desirable") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Pittsburgh. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.

In a typical year about 0.7% of renter households face a filing. That is riskier than roughly 31% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Only 21% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.

CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 2.8/10. Against average income of $90,898, annual rent is just 14%.

Statewide the PA average is 4.6, so this tract runs 1.1 points cooler. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 42003429300

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 42003429300?

Census tract 42003429300 in Allegheny County scores 3.5/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 42003429300?

Median gross rent is $1,092/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 56% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 42003429300?

6.4% of residents in tract 42003429300 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,533.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 42003429300?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 20th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 17th, household 28th, minority 23th, housing 39th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 42003429300?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 23 eviction filings across 7 validated years in tract 42003429300 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 0.69% of renter households, peaking at 0.9% in 2001. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

Was tract 42003429300 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Related