Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #75,086 of 84,120 nationally

Plum Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 42003526202 · Allegheny County, PA · pop 4,591

Census tract 42003526202 runs through Plum in Allegheny County. With 4,591 residents, it scores 4.5/10 for landlords. It lands near the 22nd percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

About 21% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a modest level, and 14% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,029 a month while the average household earns $99,750 a year, roughly 12% of income at the averages. About 21% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
1.9
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 4% Stable renters 16% Owners 80%
Tract context
Occupied units1,875
Renter share20.9%
SVI overall0.22
Poverty rate4.0%
Median income$99,750

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
60 th percentile
Rank, 60th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 6 tracts In Plum
Elevated
Within county
10 th percentile
Rank, 10th percentileLowHigh
#355 of 394 tracts In Allegheny County
Very Low
Within state
13 th percentile
Rank, 13th percentileLowHigh
#2,992 of 3,445 tracts In Pennsylvania
Very Low
National
11 th percentile
Rank, 11th percentileLowHigh
#75,086 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Plum and the region

Centroid at 40.4682, -79.7521 · click any tract to drill in

Why Plum scores 1.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Plum
6.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.0
State political climate
Pennsylvania legislature & governorship
3.4
Economic stress
4.0% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,029 rent vs county FMR
3.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Plum
3.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Plum
4.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Plum
3.0

How Plum compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Plum risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 1.91.9This tracttract 526202Plum: 3.63.6Plumparent cityCounty: 4.14.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 22

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 217Total filings over 7 yrs
  • 6.52%Avg annual filing rate
  • 8.9%Peak (2000)
  • 32Filings in 2006 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2006
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 420035262022000: 41 filings (8.90/100 renter HHs)2001: 33 filings (7.17/100 renter HHs)2002: 27 filings (5.86/100 renter HHs)2003: 25 filings (5.43/100 renter HHs)2004: 28 filings (6.08/100 renter HHs)2005: 31 filings (6.02/100 renter HHs)2006: 32 filings (6.21/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 22% over the past 7 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Plum

The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 4.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Plum eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Allegheny County average of 5.6 and below the Pennsylvania statewide average of 5.4. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 22nd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 217 eviction filings here over 7 tracked years, with about 6.5% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 8.9% of renter households in 2000.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 42003526202

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 42003526202?

Census tract 42003526202 in Plum scores 1.9/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 42003526202?

Median gross rent is $1,029/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 21% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 42003526202?

4.0% of residents in tract 42003526202 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,591.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 42003526202?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 22th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 12th, household 56th, minority 36th, housing 27th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 42003526202?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 217 eviction filings across 7 validated years in tract 42003526202 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 6.52% of renter households, peaking at 8.9% in 2000. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

How does tract 42003526202 compare to Plum overall?

Tract 42003526202 scores 1.9/10, lower than the parent city of Plum at 3.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Plum eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Plum

Top eight tracts in Plum ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related