Tract 42017101505 Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 42017101505 · Bucks County, PA · pop 3,428
Census tract 42017101505 covers part of Bucks County, PA, and scores 3.4/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 3,428 residents. Pulling hardest the other way is economic stress at 1.1/10.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Bucks County and the region
Centroid at 40.1708, -75.0245 · click any tract to drill in
Why Tract 42017101505 scores 3.4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Tract 42017101505 compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 11
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 24%Socioeconomic
- 50%Household composition
- 19%Racial/ethnic minority
- 3%Housing & transportation
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 8Total filings over 4 yrs
- 6.10%Avg annual filing rate
- 12.0%Peak (2006)
- 3Filings in 2006 (latest validated)
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
What drives eviction risk in Tract 42017101505
On the high side, court filing pressure reads 8.6/10. around a third of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, below the Bucks County average of 41.8%. Court records carry 8 eviction filings across 4 observed years.
It sits 0.6 points below the Bucks County average of 4.0. Filings peaked in 2006 at 12.0% of renter households.
In a typical year about 6.1% of renter households face a filing. That is riskier than roughly 29% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
Only 2% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 2/10.
Statewide the PA average is 4.6, so this tract runs 1.2 points cooler. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured. Model confidence here is 65%, lower than typical because some ACS inputs for this tract carry wide margins of error, so read the score as a band, not a point.
Poverty sits at 4%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.