Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Census Tract · Ranked #20,506 of 84,120 nationally
Upland Eviction Risk: Moderate
Tract 42045406300 · Delaware County, PA · pop 3,078
With a score of 5.8/10, tract 42045406300 in Upland, PA reads moderate for landlord eviction risk. 33% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, well below the Delaware County average of 50.9%.
Risk score
5.8
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 19%
Stable renters 38%
Owners 43%
Tract context
Occupied units1,226
Renter share56.9%
SVI overall0.68
Poverty rate14.3%
Median income$60,200
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
75
th percentile
Elevated
Within state
78
th percentile
High
National
76
th percentile
High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Upland and the region
Centroid at 39.8562, -75.3796 · click any tract to drill in
Why Upland scores 5.8
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Upland
6.7
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.3
State political climate
Pennsylvania legislature & governorship
3.4
Economic stress
14.3% poverty · this tract
3.6
Supply constraint
$1,047 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Upland
2.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Upland
9.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Upland
4.4
How Upland compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 68
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 62%Socioeconomic
- 83%Household composition
- 65%Racial/ethnic minority
- 46%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 18%Grade C
- 1%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 186Total filings over 7 yrs
- 6.11%Avg annual filing rate
- 10.1%Peak (2006)
- 44Filings in 2006 (latest validated)
Filings climbed 120% over the past 7 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Upland
The score leans hardest on tenant-organizing strength at 9.5/10. Well under the midpoint, supply constraint reads 1/10. On the high side, court filing pressure reads 8.8/10.
Against the Delaware County average of 4.7, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.1 points. Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 186 filings here across 7 tracked years.
The worst year on record was 2006, when 10.1% of renter households were served. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.
In a typical year about 6.1% of renter households face a filing. On the national scale it lands near the 76th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. Social vulnerability reads 7.1/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.
Statewide the PA average is 4.6, so this tract runs 1.2 points hotter. Of its three components the household composition measure is the most pressured.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 42045406300
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 42045406300?
Census tract 42045406300 in Upland scores 5.8/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 42045406300?
Median gross rent is $1,047/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 33% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 42045406300?
14.3% of residents in tract 42045406300 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,078.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 42045406300?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 68th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 62th, household 83th, minority 65th, housing 46th.
Q5
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 42045406300?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 186 eviction filings across 7 validated years in tract 42045406300 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 6.11% of renter households, peaking at 10.1% in 2006. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6
How does tract 42045406300 compare to Upland overall?
Tract 42045406300 scores 5.8/10, higher than the parent city of Upland at 4.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Upland; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q7
Was tract 42045406300 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 1% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Related