Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #49,882 of 84,120 nationally

Lansdale Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 42091200903 · Montgomery County, PA · pop 4,645

Landlord eviction risk in census tract 42091200903 (Lansdale in Montgomery County, Pennsylvania) comes in at 6.1/10, the Elevated tier. It lands near the 77th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

49% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 16% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,521 monthly, set against $79,878 in average yearly household income, roughly 23% of income at the averages. Renters make up 52% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
3.5
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 25% Stable renters 26% Owners 49%
Tract context
Occupied units1,994
Renter share51.8%
SVI overall0.65
Poverty rate10.1%
Median income$79,878

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
60 th percentile
Rank, 60th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 6 tracts In Lansdale
Elevated
Within county
86 th percentile
Rank, 86th percentileLowHigh
#32 of 219 tracts In Montgomery County
High
Within state
47 th percentile
Rank, 47th percentileLowHigh
#1,811 of 3,445 tracts In Pennsylvania
Moderate
National
41 th percentile
Rank, 41st percentileLowHigh
#49,882 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Lansdale and the region

Centroid at 40.2334, -75.2809 · click any tract to drill in

Why Lansdale scores 3.5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Lansdale
6.7
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.3
State political climate
Pennsylvania legislature & governorship
3.4
Economic stress
10.1% poverty · this tract
2.5
Supply constraint
$1,521 rent vs county FMR
3.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Lansdale
6.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Lansdale
8.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from Lansdale
5.5

How Lansdale compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Lansdale risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.53.5This tracttract 200903Lansdale: 3.93.9Lansdaleparent cityCounty: 2.32.3Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 65

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 249Total filings over 7 yrs
  • 3.95%Avg annual filing rate
  • 5.6%Peak (2006)
  • 48Filings in 2006 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2006
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 420912009032000: 27 filings (2.91/100 renter HHs)2001: 24 filings (2.59/100 renter HHs)2002: 31 filings (3.34/100 renter HHs)2003: 36 filings (3.88/100 renter HHs)2004: 38 filings (4.10/100 renter HHs)2005: 45 filings (5.24/100 renter HHs)2006: 48 filings (5.59/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 78% over the past 7 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Lansdale

The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at 8.4/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Lansdale eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Montgomery County average of 5.4 and above the Pennsylvania statewide average of 5.4. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 249 eviction filings here over 7 tracked years, with about 4.0% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 5.6% of renter households in 2006.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 65th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 42091200903

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 42091200903?

Census tract 42091200903 in Lansdale scores 3.5/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 42091200903?

Median gross rent is $1,521/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 49% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 42091200903?

10.1% of residents in tract 42091200903 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,645.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 42091200903?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 65th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 58th, household 44th, minority 52th, housing 79th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 42091200903?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 249 eviction filings across 7 validated years in tract 42091200903 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 3.95% of renter households, peaking at 5.6% in 2006. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

How does tract 42091200903 compare to Lansdale overall?

Tract 42091200903 scores 3.5/10, lower than the parent city of Lansdale at 3.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Lansdale eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Lansdale

Top eight tracts in Lansdale ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related