Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #71,178 of 84,120 nationally

Lansdale Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 42091200907 · Montgomery County, PA · pop 2,473

Eviction risk in Lansdale eviction risk centers on tract 42091200907, which scores 5.7/10 (Moderate tier) and is home to 2,473 residents. That is riskier than roughly 63% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

About 43% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 5% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,404 a month while the average household earns $124,583 a year, roughly 14% of income at the averages. Renters make up 24% of occupied homes.

Risk score
2.2
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 10% Stable renters 14% Owners 76%
Tract context
Occupied units996
Renter share24.0%
SVI overall0.01
Poverty rate1.8%
Median income$124,583

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#6 of 6 tracts In Lansdale
Very Low
Within county
64 th percentile
Rank, 64th percentileLowHigh
#80 of 219 tracts In Montgomery County
Elevated
Within state
20 th percentile
Rank, 20th percentileLowHigh
#2,770 of 3,445 tracts In Pennsylvania
Very Low
National
15 th percentile
Rank, 15th percentileLowHigh
#71,178 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Lansdale and the region

Centroid at 40.2428, -75.2951 · click any tract to drill in

Why Lansdale scores 2.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Lansdale
6.7
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.3
State political climate
Pennsylvania legislature & governorship
3.4
Economic stress
1.8% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,404 rent vs county FMR
2.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Lansdale
6.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Lansdale
8.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from Lansdale
5.5

How Lansdale compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Lansdale risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.22.2This tracttract 200907Lansdale: 3.93.9Lansdaleparent cityCounty: 2.32.3Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.93.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 1

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 45Total filings over 7 yrs
  • 2.30%Avg annual filing rate
  • 5.0%Peak (2006)
  • 14Filings in 2006 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2006
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 420912009072000: 4 filings (1.44/100 renter HHs)2001: 8 filings (2.88/100 renter HHs)2002: 9 filings (3.24/100 renter HHs)2003: 4 filings (1.44/100 renter HHs)2004: 3 filings (1.08/100 renter HHs)2005: 3 filings (1.06/100 renter HHs)2006: 14 filings (4.95/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 250% over the past 7 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Lansdale

The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at 8.4/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Lansdale eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Montgomery County average of 5.4 and in line with the Pennsylvania statewide average of 5.4. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 1st percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 45 eviction filings here over 7 tracked years, with about 2.3% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 5.0% of renter households in 2006.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 42091200907

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 42091200907?

Census tract 42091200907 in Lansdale scores 2.2/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 42091200907?

Median gross rent is $1,404/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 43% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 42091200907?

1.8% of residents in tract 42091200907 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,473.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 42091200907?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 1th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 3th, household 4th, minority 14th, housing 5th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 42091200907?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 45 eviction filings across 7 validated years in tract 42091200907 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 2.30% of renter households, peaking at 5.0% in 2006. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

How does tract 42091200907 compare to Lansdale overall?

Tract 42091200907 scores 2.2/10, lower than the parent city of Lansdale at 3.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Lansdale eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Lansdale

Top eight tracts in Lansdale ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related