Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #8,653 of 84,120 nationally

Social Eviction Risk: Elevated , Woonsocket

Tract 44007018100 · Providence County, RI · pop 3,187 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi

44007018100 is a census tract in the Social area of Woonsocket, RI. It scores 7.9/10 for landlords. Population here is 3,187. Severe burden reaches 35%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.

Risk score
7.9
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 45% Stable renters 33% Owners 22%
Tract context
Occupied units1,185
Renter share78.6%
SVI overall0.94
Poverty rate30.1%
Median income$46,202

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 3 tracts In Social
Moderate
Within parent city
67 th percentile
Rank, 67th percentileLowHigh
#5 of 13 tracts In Woonsocket
Elevated
Within county
83 th percentile
Rank, 83rd percentileLowHigh
#25 of 145 tracts In Providence County
High
Within state
89 th percentile
Rank, 89th percentileLowHigh
#27 of 247 tracts In Rhode Island
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Woonsocket and the region

Centroid at 42.0131, -71.5061 · click any tract to drill in

Why Social scores 7.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Woonsocket
6.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.1
State political climate
Rhode Island legislature & governorship
5.5
Economic stress
30.1% poverty · this tract
7.5
Supply constraint
$1,169 rent vs county FMR
2.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Woonsocket
6.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Woonsocket
9.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Woonsocket
7.0

How Social compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Social risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 7.97.9This tracttract 018100Woonsocket: 6.56.5Woonsocketparent cityCounty: 5.75.7Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.35.3Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 94

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 126Total filings over 2 yrs
  • 6.94%Avg annual filing rate
  • 7.5%Peak (2015)
  • 53Filings in 2016 (latest validated)

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 465Total filings 2020-21
  • 6.0Avg monthly (observed)
  • 5.3Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 1.15×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 11 filings (1.57× baseline)2020-02-01: 10 filings (3.64× baseline)2020-03-01: 3 filings (0.57× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 6 filings (0.96× baseline)2020-07-01: 7 filings (1.08× baseline)2020-08-01: 11 filings (1.33× baseline)2020-09-01: 5 filings (0.95× baseline)2020-10-01: 5 filings (0.77× baseline)2020-11-01: 9 filings (1.44× baseline)2020-12-01: 4 filings (1.33× baseline)2021-01-01: 4 filings (0.57× baseline)2021-02-01: 5 filings (1.82× baseline)2021-03-01: 9 filings (1.71× baseline)2021-04-01: 2 filings (0.38× baseline)2021-05-01: 3 filings (0.57× baseline)2021-06-01: 2 filings (0.32× baseline)2021-07-01: 1 filings (0.15× baseline)2021-08-01: 6 filings (0.73× baseline)2021-09-01: 9 filings (1.71× baseline)2021-10-01: 5 filings (0.77× baseline)2021-11-01: 2 filings (0.32× baseline)2021-12-01: 6 filings (2.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 9 filings (1.29× baseline)2022-02-01: 4 filings (1.45× baseline)2022-03-01: 6 filings (1.14× baseline)2022-04-01: 5 filings (0.95× baseline)2022-05-01: 5 filings (0.95× baseline)2022-06-01: 7 filings (1.12× baseline)2022-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 9 filings (1.09× baseline)2022-09-01: 7 filings (1.33× baseline)2022-10-01: 14 filings (2.15× baseline)2022-11-01: 10 filings (1.60× baseline)2022-12-01: 13 filings (4.33× baseline)2023-01-01: 5 filings (0.71× baseline)2023-02-01: 4 filings (1.45× baseline)2023-03-01: 7 filings (1.33× baseline)2023-04-01: 8 filings (1.52× baseline)2023-05-01: 7 filings (1.33× baseline)2023-06-01: 3 filings (0.48× baseline)2023-07-01: 5 filings (0.77× baseline)2023-08-01: 11 filings (1.33× baseline)2023-09-01: 7 filings (1.33× baseline)2023-10-01: 6 filings (0.92× baseline)2023-11-01: 5 filings (0.80× baseline)2023-12-01: 6 filings (2.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 11 filings (1.57× baseline)2024-02-01: 6 filings (2.18× baseline)2024-03-01: 6 filings (1.14× baseline)2024-04-01: 8 filings (1.52× baseline)2024-05-01: 12 filings (2.29× baseline)2024-06-01: 4 filings (0.64× baseline)2024-07-01: 7 filings (1.08× baseline)2024-08-01: 3 filings (0.36× baseline)2024-09-01: 8 filings (1.52× baseline)2024-10-01: 2 filings (0.31× baseline)2024-11-01: 4 filings (0.64× baseline)2024-12-01: 3 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 3 filings (0.43× baseline)2025-02-01: 4 filings (1.45× baseline)2025-03-01: 3 filings (0.57× baseline)2025-04-01: 2 filings (0.38× baseline)2025-05-01: 8 filings (1.52× baseline)2025-06-01: 7 filings (1.12× baseline)2025-07-01: 14 filings (2.15× baseline)2025-08-01: 6 filings (0.73× baseline)2025-09-01: 5 filings (0.95× baseline)2025-10-01: 7 filings (1.08× baseline)2025-11-01: 2 filings (0.32× baseline)2025-12-01: 6 filings (2.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran near baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Portland, OR as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Social. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Social

The dominant input is tenant-organizing strength at 9.7/10. SNAP participation runs 38.6% against 15.2% nationally. Against Providence County at 43.2%, 58% of renters here are cost-burdened.

Food insecurity runs 37.3% against 17.8% nationally. It sits 2.2 points above the Providence County average of 5.7.

79% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. The poverty rate is 30%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest.

Running cool, supply constraint reads 2.2/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, court filing pressure reads 7.5/10. Court records carry 126 eviction filings across 2 observed years.

The worst year on record was 2015, when 7.5% of renter households were served. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 44007018100

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 44007018100?

Census tract 44007018100 in the Social neighborhood scores 7.9/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 44007018100?

Median gross rent is $1,169/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 58% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 44007018100?

30.1% of residents in tract 44007018100 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,187.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 44007018100?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 94th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 93th, household 97th, minority 71th, housing 71th.
Q5

Is tract 44007018100 considered part of Social?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 44007018100 fall within Social (neighborhood centroid within 0.6 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 44007018100?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 126 eviction filings across 2 validated years in tract 44007018100 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 6.94% of renter households, peaking at 7.5% in 2015. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 44007018100 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 1.15× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings returned near baseline. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Portland, OR), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 44007018100 struggle to pay rent?

About 28.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 18.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 44007018100 compare to Woonsocket overall?

Tract 44007018100 scores 7.9/10, higher than the parent city of Woonsocket at 6.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Woonsocket eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q10

Was tract 44007018100 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 28% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Woonsocket

Top eight tracts in Woonsocket ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related