Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #81,634 of 84,120 nationally

Mount Pleasant Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 45019004610 · Charleston County, SC · pop 5,446 · 48% of tract blocks fall in Mount Pleasant

Census tract 45019004610 runs through Mount Pleasant. With 5,446 residents, it scores 4.5/10 for landlords. It lands near the 22nd percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 34% of renter households, a high level, and 6% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $2,109 monthly, set against $140,769 in average yearly household income, roughly 18% of income at the averages. About 13% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
1.2
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 4% Stable renters 8% Owners 88%
Tract context
Occupied units2,178
Renter share12.8%
SVI overall0.14
Poverty rate4.4%
Median income$140,769

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
13 th percentile
Rank, 13th percentileLowHigh
#14 of 16 tracts In Mount Pleasant
Very Low
Within county
1 th percentile
Rank, 1st percentileLowHigh
#97 of 98 tracts In Charleston County
Very Low
Within state
1 th percentile
Rank, 1st percentileLowHigh
#1,303 of 1,317 tracts In South Carolina
Very Low
National
3 th percentile
Rank, 3rd percentileLowHigh
#81,634 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Mount Pleasant and the region

Centroid at 32.8245, -79.7689 · click any tract to drill in

Why Mount Pleasant scores 1.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Mount Pleasant
2.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.6
State political climate
South Carolina legislature & governorship
2.1
Economic stress
4.4% poverty · this tract
1.1
Supply constraint
$2,109 rent vs county FMR
6.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Mount Pleasant
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Mount Pleasant
1.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Mount Pleasant
2.0

How Mount Pleasant compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Mount Pleasant risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 1.21.2This tracttract 004610Mount Pleasant: 2.22.2Mount Pleasantparent cityCounty: 3.23.2Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.04.0Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 14

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 70Total filings over 4 yrs
  • 4.76%Avg annual filing rate
  • 7.3%Peak (2012)
  • 14Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2012 to 2015
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 450190046102012: 27 filings (7.34/100 renter HHs)2013: 15 filings (4.08/100 renter HHs)2014: 14 filings (3.80/100 renter HHs)2015: 14 filings (3.80/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 48% over the past 4 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 57Total filings 2020-21
  • 0.7Avg monthly (observed)
  • 1.1Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.67×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2020-08-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 2 filings (4.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 3 filings (6.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2021-03-01: 2 filings (8.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 1 filings (0.57× baseline)2021-05-01: 5 filings (2.50× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2021-08-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 2 filings (2.67× baseline)2021-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 2 filings (4.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2022-02-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2022-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2022-06-01: 1 filings (1.33× baseline)2022-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 1 filings (1.33× baseline)2022-11-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2022-12-01: 1 filings (2.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 3 filings (12.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2023-06-01: 1 filings (1.33× baseline)2023-07-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2023-08-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2023-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 3 filings (4.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2023-12-01: 1 filings (2.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 1 filings (0.57× baseline)2024-05-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2024-06-01: 2 filings (2.67× baseline)2024-07-01: 2 filings (1.60× baseline)2024-08-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2024-09-01: 1 filings (2.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2024-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2025-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 1 filings (1.33× baseline)2025-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2025-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Charleston, SC as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Mount Pleasant

The heaviest input here is supply constraint at 6.6/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Mount Pleasant eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Charleston County average of 5.2 and below the South Carolina statewide average of 5.5. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 0.67x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, well below the pre-pandemic norm, the signature of an eviction moratorium at work.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 70 eviction filings here over 4 tracked years, with about 4.8% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 7.3% of renter households in 2012.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 45019004610

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 45019004610?

Census tract 45019004610 in Mount Pleasant scores 1.2/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 45019004610?

Median gross rent is $2,109/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 34% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 45019004610?

4.4% of residents in tract 45019004610 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,446.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 45019004610?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 14th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 11th, household 34th, minority 29th, housing 22th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 45019004610?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 70 eviction filings across 4 validated years in tract 45019004610 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 4.76% of renter households, peaking at 7.3% in 2012. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 45019004610 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.67× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Charleston eviction risk, SC), 2020-2021.
Q7

What share of households in tract 45019004610 struggle to pay rent?

About 7.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 45019004610 compare to Mount Pleasant overall?

Tract 45019004610 scores 1.2/10, lower than the parent city of Mount Pleasant at 2.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Mount Pleasant eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Mount Pleasant

Top eight tracts in Mount Pleasant ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related