Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #19,562 of 84,120 nationally

Chicora Place Eviction Risk: Moderate , North Charleston

Tract 45019005500 · Charleston County, SC · pop 1,521 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi

With a score of $1/10, tract 45019005500 in the Chicora Place neighborhood of North Charleston ranks in the Elevated tier for landlord eviction risk. The tract is home to 1,521 residents. That is riskier than about 74% of US census tracts.

About 62% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 38% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $981 a month against an average household income of $37,500 a year, roughly 31% of income at the averages. About 65% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
5.4
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 41% Stable renters 25% Owners 34%
Tract context
Occupied units654
Renter share65.3%
SVI overall0.91
Poverty rate44.8%
Median income$37,500

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Chicora Place
Moderate
Within parent city
87 th percentile
Rank, 87th percentileLowHigh
#5 of 31 tracts In North Charleston
High
Within county
95 th percentile
Rank, 95th percentileLowHigh
#6 of 98 tracts In Charleston County
Very High
Within state
85 th percentile
Rank, 85th percentileLowHigh
#201 of 1,317 tracts In South Carolina
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across North Charleston and the region

Centroid at 32.8533, -79.9556 · click any tract to drill in

Why Chicora Place scores 5.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from North Charleston
4.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.6
State political climate
South Carolina legislature & governorship
2.1
Economic stress
44.8% poverty · this tract
10.0
Supply constraint
$981 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from North Charleston
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from North Charleston
3.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from North Charleston
3.0

How Chicora Place compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Chicora Place risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.45.4This tracttract 005500North Charleston: 2.62.6North Charlestonparent cityCounty: 3.23.2Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.04.0Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 91

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 817Total filings over 4 yrs
  • 46.63%Avg annual filing rate
  • 53.9%Peak (2012)
  • 162Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2012 to 2015
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 450190055002012: 236 filings (53.88/100 renter HHs)2013: 228 filings (52.05/100 renter HHs)2014: 191 filings (43.61/100 renter HHs)2015: 162 filings (36.99/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 31% over the past 4 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 558Total filings 2020-21
  • 7.3Avg monthly (observed)
  • 13.4Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.54×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 13 filings (0.88× baseline)2020-02-01: 18 filings (1.22× baseline)2020-03-01: 8 filings (0.59× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 6 filings (0.38× baseline)2020-06-01: 3 filings (0.20× baseline)2020-07-01: 7 filings (0.39× baseline)2020-08-01: 7 filings (0.48× baseline)2020-09-01: 10 filings (0.55× baseline)2020-10-01: 9 filings (0.77× baseline)2020-11-01: 3 filings (0.35× baseline)2020-12-01: 4 filings (0.28× baseline)2021-01-01: 5 filings (0.34× baseline)2021-02-01: 7 filings (0.47× baseline)2021-03-01: 4 filings (0.30× baseline)2021-04-01: 4 filings (0.29× baseline)2021-05-01: 1 filings (0.06× baseline)2021-06-01: 22 filings (1.47× baseline)2021-07-01: 7 filings (0.39× baseline)2021-08-01: 8 filings (0.55× baseline)2021-09-01: 10 filings (0.55× baseline)2021-10-01: 6 filings (0.51× baseline)2021-11-01: 8 filings (0.94× baseline)2021-12-01: 10 filings (0.70× baseline)2022-01-01: 22 filings (1.49× baseline)2022-02-01: 4 filings (0.27× baseline)2022-03-01: 8 filings (0.59× baseline)2022-04-01: 21 filings (1.53× baseline)2022-05-01: 5 filings (0.32× baseline)2022-06-01: 8 filings (0.53× baseline)2022-07-01: 16 filings (0.90× baseline)2022-08-01: 8 filings (0.55× baseline)2022-09-01: 5 filings (0.27× baseline)2022-10-01: 9 filings (0.77× baseline)2022-11-01: 8 filings (0.94× baseline)2022-12-01: 4 filings (0.28× baseline)2023-01-01: 13 filings (0.88× baseline)2023-02-01: 15 filings (1.02× baseline)2023-03-01: 14 filings (1.04× baseline)2023-04-01: 6 filings (0.44× baseline)2023-05-01: 9 filings (0.57× baseline)2023-06-01: 5 filings (0.33× baseline)2023-07-01: 6 filings (0.34× baseline)2023-08-01: 4 filings (0.28× baseline)2023-09-01: 3 filings (0.16× baseline)2023-10-01: 7 filings (0.60× baseline)2023-11-01: 6 filings (0.71× baseline)2023-12-01: 5 filings (0.35× baseline)2024-01-01: 10 filings (0.68× baseline)2024-02-01: 10 filings (0.68× baseline)2024-03-01: 7 filings (0.52× baseline)2024-04-01: 5 filings (0.36× baseline)2024-05-01: 5 filings (0.32× baseline)2024-06-01: 21 filings (1.40× baseline)2024-07-01: 7 filings (0.39× baseline)2024-08-01: 7 filings (0.48× baseline)2024-09-01: 4 filings (0.22× baseline)2024-10-01: 6 filings (0.51× baseline)2024-11-01: 7 filings (0.82× baseline)2024-12-01: 9 filings (0.63× baseline)2025-01-01: 10 filings (0.68× baseline)2025-02-01: 9 filings (0.61× baseline)2025-03-01: 3 filings (0.22× baseline)2025-04-01: 4 filings (0.29× baseline)2025-05-01: 7 filings (0.44× baseline)2025-06-01: 5 filings (0.33× baseline)2025-07-01: 3 filings (0.17× baseline)2025-08-01: 5 filings (0.34× baseline)2025-09-01: 6 filings (0.33× baseline)2025-10-01: 7 filings (0.60× baseline)2025-11-01: 7 filings (0.82× baseline)2025-12-01: 3 filings (0.21× baseline)2026-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Charleston, SC as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Chicora Place

What moves this score most is economic stress at $1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from North Charleston eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Charleston County average of 5.2 and above the South Carolina statewide average of 5.5. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 817 eviction filings here over 4 tracked years, with about 46.6% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 53.9% of renter households in 2012.

The tract is predominantly Black and ranks around the 91st percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 45019005500

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 45019005500?

Census tract 45019005500 in the Chicora Place neighborhood scores 5.4/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 45019005500?

Median gross rent is $981/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 62% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 45019005500?

44.8% of residents in tract 45019005500 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,521.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 45019005500?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 91th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 98th, household 39th, minority 81th, housing 87th.
Q5

Is tract 45019005500 considered part of Chicora Place?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 45019005500 fall within Chicora Place (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 45019005500?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 817 eviction filings across 4 validated years in tract 45019005500 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 46.63% of renter households, peaking at 53.9% in 2012. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 45019005500 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.54× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Charleston eviction risk, SC), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 45019005500 struggle to pay rent?

About 33.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 27.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 45019005500 compare to North Charleston overall?

Tract 45019005500 scores 5.4/10, higher than the parent city of North Charleston at 2.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from North Charleston eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in North Charleston

Top eight tracts in North Charleston ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related