Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #18,163 of 84,120 nationally

Woodside Cotton Mill Village Historic District Eviction Risk: Elevated , Parker

Tract 45045002202 · Greenville County, SC · pop 2,770 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi

Census tract 45045002202 covers part of the Woodside Cotton Mill Village Historic District area of Parker, SC, and scores 6/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 2,770 residents. The dominant input is court filing pressure at 9.6/10.

Risk score
6
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 42% Stable renters 27% Owners 31%
Tract context
Occupied units1,276
Renter share68.5%
SVI overall0.97
Poverty rate21.7%
Median income$35,095

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Woodside Cotton Mill Village Historic District
Moderate
Within parent city
25 th percentile
Rank, 25th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 5 tracts In Parker
Low
Within county
97 th percentile
Rank, 97th percentileLowHigh
#5 of 123 tracts In Greenville County
Very High
Within state
98 th percentile
Rank, 98th percentileLowHigh
#24 of 1,317 tracts In South Carolina
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Parker and the region

Centroid at 34.8548, -82.4401 · click any tract to drill in

Why Woodside Cotton Mill Village Historic District scores 6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Parker
4.7
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.1
State political climate
South Carolina legislature & governorship
2.1
Economic stress
21.7% poverty · this tract
5.4
Supply constraint
$1,049 rent vs county FMR
3.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Parker
8.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.8
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Parker
9.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Parker
8.7

How Woodside Cotton Mill Village Historic District compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Woodside Cotton Mill Village Historic District risk score vs. parent city / county / state6.0This tracttract 0022024.6Parkerparent city4.1Countyavg tract in county4.0Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 97

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 960Total filings 2020-21
  • 13.7Avg monthly (observed)
  • 10.6Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 1.29×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2025-10-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline

Pandemic filings ran near baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Greenville, SC as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Woodside Cotton Mill Village Historic District

Against Greenville County at 45.8%, 61% of renters here are cost-burdened. Running hot, tenant-organizing strength reads 9.6/10.

Annualized rent equals 36% of average household income of $35,095, past the 30% affordability line, which thins the margin any screening standard has to work with. Against the Greenville County average of 4.1, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.9 points. On the high side, housing-court posture reads 8.7/10.

This is renter territory: 69% of occupied units are tenant-occupied. 18% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. SNAP participation runs 26.5% against 15.2% nationally.

The poverty rate is 22%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 18.6% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two.

That is riskier than roughly 78% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 45045002202

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 45045002202?

Census tract 45045002202 in the Woodside Cotton Mill Village Historic District neighborhood scores 6/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 45045002202?

Median gross rent is $1,049/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 61% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 45045002202?

21.7% of residents in tract 45045002202 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,770.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 45045002202?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 97th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 99th, household 93th, minority 72th, housing 80th.
Q5

Is tract 45045002202 considered part of Woodside Cotton Mill Village Historic District?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 45045002202 fall within Woodside Cotton Mill Village Historic District (neighborhood centroid within 0.6 miles, OSM data).
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 45045002202 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 1.29× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings returned near baseline. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Greenville eviction risk, SC), 2020-2021.
Q7

What share of households in tract 45045002202 struggle to pay rent?

About 26.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 18.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 45045002202 compare to Parker overall?

Tract 45045002202 scores 6/10, higher than the parent city of Parker at 4.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Parker eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Parker

Top eight tracts in Parker ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related