Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #34,278 of 84,120 nationally

Palisades at the Park Eviction Risk: Moderate , Gantt

Tract 45045002005 · Greenville County, SC · pop 4,952 · neighborhood within 1.2 mi

45045002005 is a census tract in the Palisades at the Park area of Gantt, SC. It scores 4.9/10 for landlords. What pushes it up most is court filing pressure at 9.6/10.

Risk score
4.9
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 16% Stable renters 19% Owners 65%
Tract context
Occupied units1,700
Renter share34.8%
SVI overall0.86
Poverty rate12.1%
Median income$51,098

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Palisades at the Park
Very High
Within parent city
20 th percentile
Rank, 20th percentileLowHigh
#5 of 6 tracts In Gantt
Low
Within county
70 th percentile
Rank, 70th percentileLowHigh
#38 of 123 tracts In Greenville County
Elevated
Within state
82 th percentile
Rank, 82nd percentileLowHigh
#245 of 1,317 tracts In South Carolina
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Gantt and the region

Centroid at 34.7834, -82.3710 · click any tract to drill in

Why Palisades at the Park scores 4.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Gantt
4.7
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.1
State political climate
South Carolina legislature & governorship
2.1
Economic stress
12.1% poverty · this tract
3.0
Supply constraint
$997 rent vs county FMR
2.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Gantt
7.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Gantt
8.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Gantt
7.9

How Palisades at the Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Palisades at the Park risk score vs. parent city / county / state4.9This tracttract 0020054.0Ganttparent city4.1Countyavg tract in county4.0Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 86

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 911Total filings 2020-21
  • 13.0Avg monthly (observed)
  • 22.8Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.57×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2025-10-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Greenville, SC as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Palisades at the Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Palisades at the Park

On the softer side, eviction-process difficulty reads 2/10. Running hot, tenant-organizing strength reads 8/10.

Severe burden reaches 14%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Housing insecurity runs 23.4% against 14.2% nationally. Against the Greenville County average of 4.1, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 0.8 points.

Inability to pay a utility bill runs 15.4% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. On the national scale it lands near the 59th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.

Social vulnerability reads 8.7/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Statewide the SC average is 4.0, so this tract runs 0.9 points hotter.

Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the most pressured. 46% of renter households spend at least 30% of income on rent. Average gross rent is $997, close to the Gantt average.

Annual rent works out to 23% of average household income of $51,098.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 45045002005

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 45045002005?

Census tract 45045002005 in the Palisades at the Park neighborhood scores 4.9/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 45045002005?

Median gross rent is $997/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 46% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 45045002005?

12.1% of residents in tract 45045002005 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,952.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 45045002005?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 86th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 80th, household 67th, minority 78th, housing 87th.
Q5

Is tract 45045002005 considered part of Palisades at the Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 45045002005 fall within Palisades at the Park (neighborhood centroid within 1.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 45045002005 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.57× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Greenville eviction risk, SC), 2020-2021.
Q7

What share of households in tract 45045002005 struggle to pay rent?

About 23.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 15.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 45045002005 compare to Gantt overall?

Tract 45045002005 scores 4.9/10, higher than the parent city of Gantt at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Gantt eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Gantt

Top eight tracts in Gantt ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related