Ridgewalk Cottages Eviction Risk: Lower , Five Forks
Tract 45045002814 · Greenville County, SC · pop 6,274 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi
With a score of 3/10, tract 45045002814 in the Ridgewalk Cottages area of Five Forks, SC reads lower for landlord eviction risk. The score leans hardest on supply constraint at 10/10.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Five Forks and the region
Centroid at 34.8300, -82.2121 · click any tract to drill in
Why Ridgewalk Cottages scores 3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Ridgewalk Cottages compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 5
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 8%Socioeconomic
- 35%Household composition
- 29%Racial/ethnic minority
- 3%Housing & transportation
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
- 49Total filings 2020-21
- 0.7Avg monthly (observed)
- 0.6Pre-pandemic baseline
- 1.09×Ratio to baseline
Pandemic filings ran near baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Greenville, SC as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 6.0%Housing insecurity
- 4.0%Utility-shutoff threat
- 6.7%Food insecurity
- 2.8%SNAP enrollment
- 3.9%Transit barriers
- 5.7%No health insurance
- 12.7%Frequent mental distress
- 21.0%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Ridgewalk Cottages
The voucher gap is 55.4%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. On the high side, court filing pressure reads 9.6/10. Running hot, rent-regulation exposure reads 9.6/10.
SNAP participation runs 2.8% against 15.2% nationally. Against the Greenville County average of 4.1, this tract reads safer for landlords by 1.1 points.
11% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 4.0% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two.
That is riskier than roughly 20% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. At 8% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 1.4/10.
Against average income of $160,693, annual rent is just 15%. Statewide the SC average is 4.0, so this tract runs 1.0 points cooler. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
About tract 45045002814
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 45045002814?
What is the average rent in tract 45045002814?
What is the poverty rate in tract 45045002814?
How socially vulnerable is tract 45045002814?
Is tract 45045002814 considered part of Ridgewalk Cottages?
Did eviction filings in tract 45045002814 drop during COVID?
What share of households in tract 45045002814 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 45045002814 compare to Five Forks overall?
Highest-risk tracts in Five Forks
Top eight tracts in Five Forks ranked by composite eviction-risk score.