Within neighborhood
100
th percentile
Very High
Neighborhood · Ranked #31,159 of 84,120 nationally
Palisades at the Park Eviction Risk: Moderate , Gantt
Tract 45045002005 · Greenville County, SC · pop 4,952 · neighborhood within 1.2 mi
Census tract 45045002005 runs through the Palisades at the Park neighborhood of Gantt. With 4,952 residents, it scores 6.1/10 for landlords. That is riskier than roughly 77% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
46% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 14% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $997 a month against an average household income of $51,098 a year, roughly 23% of income at the averages. Renters make up 35% of occupied homes.
Risk score
4.6
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 16%
Stable renters 19%
Owners 65%
Tract context
Occupied units1,700
Renter share34.8%
SVI overall0.86
Poverty rate12.1%
Median income$51,098
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
20
th percentile
Low
Within county
72
th percentile
Elevated
Within state
67
th percentile
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Gantt and the region
Centroid at 34.7834, -82.3710 · click any tract to drill in
Why Palisades at the Park scores 4.6
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Gantt
4.7
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.1
State political climate
South Carolina legislature & governorship
2.1
Economic stress
12.1% poverty · this tract
3.0
Supply constraint
$997 rent vs county FMR
2.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Gantt
7.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Gantt
8.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Gantt
7.9
How Palisades at the Park compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 86
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 80%Socioeconomic
- 67%Household composition
- 78%Racial/ethnic minority
- 87%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
- 911Total filings 2020-21
- 13.0Avg monthly (observed)
- 22.8Pre-pandemic baseline
- 0.57×Ratio to baseline
Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Greenville, SC as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Palisades at the Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 23.4%Housing insecurity
- 15.4%Utility-shutoff threat
- 31.5%Food insecurity
- 20.3%SNAP enrollment
- 14.1%Transit barriers
- 17.9%No health insurance
- 19.5%Frequent mental distress
- 38.0%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Palisades at the Park
The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Gantt eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Greenville County average of 5.6 and above the South Carolina statewide average of 5.5. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
The tract is White and Black and ranks around the 86th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.
In CDC survey modeling, about 23.4% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 15.4% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
Frequently asked
About tract 45045002005
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 45045002005?
Census tract 45045002005 in the Palisades at the Park neighborhood scores 4.6/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 45045002005?
Median gross rent is $997/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 46% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 45045002005?
12.1% of residents in tract 45045002005 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,952.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 45045002005?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 86th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 80th, household 67th, minority 78th, housing 87th.
Q5
Is tract 45045002005 considered part of Palisades at the Park?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 45045002005 fall within Palisades at the Park (neighborhood centroid within 1.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6
Did eviction filings in tract 45045002005 drop during COVID?
Pandemic-era filings ran 0.57× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Greenville eviction risk, SC), 2020-2021.
Q7
What share of households in tract 45045002005 struggle to pay rent?
About 23.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 15.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 45045002005 compare to Gantt overall?
Tract 45045002005 scores 4.6/10, higher than the parent city of Gantt at 2.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Gantt eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Gantt
Top eight tracts in Gantt ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related