Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #15,522 of 84,120 nationally
Woodside Cotton Mill Village Historic District Eviction Risk: Moderate , Parker
Tract 45045002202 · Greenville County, SC · pop 2,770 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi
With a score of 6.7/10, tract 45045002202 in the Woodside Cotton Mill Village Historic District area of Parker ranks in the Elevated tier for landlord eviction risk. The tract is home to 2,770 residents. That is riskier than about 90% of US census tracts.
61% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 18% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,049 a month while the average household earns $35,095 a year, roughly 36% of income at the averages. Renters make up 69% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.
Risk score
5.7
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 42%
Stable renters 27%
Owners 31%
Tract context
Occupied units1,276
Renter share68.5%
SVI overall0.97
Poverty rate21.7%
Median income$35,095
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
25
th percentile
Low
Within county
88
th percentile
High
Within state
90
th percentile
Very High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Parker and the region
Centroid at 34.8548, -82.4401 · click any tract to drill in
Why Woodside Cotton Mill Village Historic District scores 5.7
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Parker
4.7
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.1
State political climate
South Carolina legislature & governorship
2.1
Economic stress
21.7% poverty · this tract
5.4
Supply constraint
$1,049 rent vs county FMR
3.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Parker
8.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.8
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Parker
9.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Parker
8.7
How Woodside Cotton Mill Village Historic District compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 97
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 99%Socioeconomic
- 93%Household composition
- 72%Racial/ethnic minority
- 80%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
- 960Total filings 2020-21
- 13.7Avg monthly (observed)
- 10.6Pre-pandemic baseline
- 1.29×Ratio to baseline
Pandemic filings ran near baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Greenville, SC as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 26.9%Housing insecurity
- 18.6%Utility-shutoff threat
- 37.4%Food insecurity
- 26.5%SNAP enrollment
- 17.1%Transit barriers
- 24.9%No health insurance
- 21.2%Frequent mental distress
- 41.0%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Woodside Cotton Mill Village Historic District
What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 9.6/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Parker eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Greenville County average of 5.6 and above the South Carolina statewide average of 5.5. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
The tract is Black and White and ranks around the 97th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.
In CDC survey modeling, about 26.9% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 18.6% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
Frequently asked
About tract 45045002202
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 45045002202?
Census tract 45045002202 in the Woodside Cotton Mill Village Historic District neighborhood scores 5.7/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 45045002202?
Median gross rent is $1,049/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 61% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 45045002202?
21.7% of residents in tract 45045002202 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,770.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 45045002202?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 97th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 99th, household 93th, minority 72th, housing 80th.
Q5
Is tract 45045002202 considered part of Woodside Cotton Mill Village Historic District?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 45045002202 fall within Woodside Cotton Mill Village Historic District (neighborhood centroid within 0.6 miles, OSM data).
Q6
Did eviction filings in tract 45045002202 drop during COVID?
Pandemic-era filings ran 1.29× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings returned near baseline. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Greenville eviction risk, SC), 2020-2021.
Q7
What share of households in tract 45045002202 struggle to pay rent?
About 26.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 18.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 45045002202 compare to Parker overall?
Tract 45045002202 scores 5.7/10, higher than the parent city of Parker at 2.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Parker eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Parker
Top eight tracts in Parker ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related