Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #44,543 of 84,120 nationally

Jasmine Lake Eviction Risk: Lower , Garden City

Tract 45051051406 · Horry County, SC · pop 3,560 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi

How risky is the Jasmine Lake area of Garden City for landlords? Census tract 45051051406 scores 5.2/10, the Moderate tier. That is riskier than about 45% of US census tracts.

About 62% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 25% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,300 a month while the average household earns $41,691 a year, roughly 37% of income at the averages. Renters make up 18% of occupied homes.

Risk score
3.8
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 11% Stable renters 7% Owners 82%
Tract context
Occupied units2,089
Renter share17.5%
SVI overall0.64
Poverty rate14.8%
Median income$41,691

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Jasmine Lake
Moderate
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 4 tracts In Garden City
Very High
Within county
59 th percentile
Rank, 59th percentileLowHigh
#32 of 77 tracts In Horry County
Elevated
Within state
46 th percentile
Rank, 46th percentileLowHigh
#706 of 1,317 tracts In South Carolina
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Garden City and the region

Centroid at 33.5913, -79.0184 · click any tract to drill in

Why Jasmine Lake scores 3.8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Garden City
4.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.3
State political climate
South Carolina legislature & governorship
2.1
Economic stress
14.8% poverty · this tract
3.7
Supply constraint
$1,300 rent vs county FMR
4.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Garden City
1.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Garden City
1.8
Housing court bias
Inherited from Garden City
2.1

How Jasmine Lake compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Jasmine Lake risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.83.8This tracttract 051406Garden City: 2.32.3Garden Cityparent cityCounty: 3.73.7Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.04.0Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 64

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 394Total filings over 5 yrs
  • 20.35%Avg annual filing rate
  • 23.3%Peak (2011)
  • 82Filings in 2014 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2010 to 2014
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 450510514062010: 56 filings (14.18/100 renter HHs)2011: 90 filings (23.32/100 renter HHs)2012: 77 filings (19.95/100 renter HHs)2013: 89 filings (23.06/100 renter HHs)2014: 82 filings (21.24/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 46% over the past 5 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Jasmine Lake

The heaviest input here is supply constraint at 4.2/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Garden City eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Horry County average of 5.3 and in line with the South Carolina statewide average of 5.5. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 64th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 394 eviction filings here over 5 tracked years, with about 20.4% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 23.3% of renter households in 2011.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 45051051406

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 45051051406?

Census tract 45051051406 in the Jasmine Lake neighborhood scores 3.8/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 45051051406?

Median gross rent is $1,300/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 62% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 45051051406?

14.8% of residents in tract 45051051406 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,560.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 45051051406?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 64th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 71th, household 24th, minority 9th, housing 88th.
Q5

Is tract 45051051406 considered part of Jasmine Lake?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 45051051406 fall within Jasmine Lake (neighborhood centroid within 0.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 45051051406?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 394 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 45051051406 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 20.35% of renter households, peaking at 23.3% in 2011. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 45051051406 struggle to pay rent?

About 7.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 45051051406 compare to Garden City overall?

Tract 45051051406 scores 3.8/10, higher than the parent city of Garden City at 2.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Garden City eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Garden City

Top eight tracts in Garden City ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related