Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #61,757 of 84,120 nationally

Regatta Forest Eviction Risk: Lower , Irmo

Tract 45063021115 · Lexington County, SC · pop 2,435 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi

Census tract 45063021115 sits in Regatta Forest in Irmo eviction risk, South Carolina eviction laws, and carries an eviction-risk score of 5.4/10. That is riskier than roughly 52% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

43% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 15% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,690 a month against an average household income of $88,393 a year, roughly 23% of income at the averages. About 50% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
2.8
Lower
Confidence 80% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 21% Stable renters 28% Owners 51%
Tract context
Occupied units1,261
Renter share49.6%
SVI overall0.30
Poverty rate9.4%
Median income$88,393

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Regatta Forest
Very High
Within county
43 th percentile
Rank, 43rd percentileLowHigh
#53 of 92 tracts In Lexington County
Moderate
Within state
22 th percentile
Rank, 22nd percentileLowHigh
#1,025 of 1,317 tracts In South Carolina
Low
National
27 th percentile
Rank, 27th percentileLowHigh
#61,757 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Irmo and the region

Centroid at 34.0670, -81.2422 · click any tract to drill in

Why Regatta Forest scores 2.8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Irmo
2.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.5
State political climate
South Carolina legislature & governorship
2.1
Economic stress
9.4% poverty · this tract
2.3
Supply constraint
$1,690 rent vs county FMR
8.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Irmo
2.1
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Irmo
4.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Irmo
5.0

How Regatta Forest compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Regatta Forest risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.82.8This tracttract 021115Irmo: 2.62.6Irmoparent cityCounty: 3.13.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.04.0Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 30

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 175Total filings over 5 yrs
  • 10.33%Avg annual filing rate
  • 15.9%Peak (2011)
  • 17Filings in 2014 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2010 to 2014
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 450630211152010: 35 filings (11.08/100 renter HHs)2011: 55 filings (15.94/100 renter HHs)2012: 48 filings (13.91/100 renter HHs)2013: 20 filings (5.80/100 renter HHs)2014: 17 filings (4.93/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 51% over the past 5 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Regatta Forest. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Regatta Forest

The heaviest input here is supply constraint at $1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Irmo eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Lexington County average of 5.3 and in line with the South Carolina statewide average of 5.5. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 30th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 175 eviction filings here over 5 tracked years, with about 10.3% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 15.9% of renter households in 2011.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 45063021115

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 45063021115?

Census tract 45063021115 in the Regatta Forest neighborhood scores 2.8/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 45063021115?

Median gross rent is $1,690/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 43% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 45063021115?

9.4% of residents in tract 45063021115 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,435.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 45063021115?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 30th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 11th, household 34th, minority 32th, housing 69th.
Q5

Is tract 45063021115 considered part of Regatta Forest?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 45063021115 fall within Regatta Forest (neighborhood centroid within 0.6 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 45063021115?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 175 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 45063021115 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 10.33% of renter households, peaking at 15.9% in 2011. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 45063021115 struggle to pay rent?

About 7.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 45063021115 compare to Irmo overall?

Tract 45063021115 scores 2.8/10, right in line with the parent city of Irmo at 2.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Irmo eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related