Saluda County, South Carolina Eviction Risk: Low
3 incorporated cities and unincorporated areas. The county Eviction Risk Score is held aloft by the city of Saluda (2.5) and a small number of dense urban cores. Rent-control coverage varies by city.
Ranked #31 of 46 SC counties
4k residents · 3 cities · 6 tracts
Saluda County eviction risk score history
Key metrics
-
Tenant beats landlord18.2%/ 100 outcomesIn court-decided eviction outcomes for Saluda County, SC, tenants prevail in roughly 18.2% of contested cases. A higher number means landlords face stronger tenant defenses and longer calendars.
-
Timeline39dfiling → judgmentFrom the moment an unlawful-detainer notice is filed in Saluda County, SC until a money judgment is entered, a contested eviction takes about 39 days on average. Longer timelines mean more lost rent for landlords.
-
Cost range$1.6–3.7klegal + lost rentA typical eviction in Saluda County, SC costs landlords $1,561 to $3,688 all-in, covering court filing fees, process-server costs, attorney time, and lost rent.
-
Average rent$78733% stretched on rentAverage gross rent in Saluda County, SC is $787 per month per the U.S. Census American Community Survey. 33% of renter households here spend more than 30% of pre-tax income on rent.
-
Renters47.8%of households47.8% of occupied housing units in Saluda County, SC are renter-occupied. A higher renter share usually correlates with more eviction filings and a more active rental market.
-
Poverty36.6%3.6% unemp.36.6% of Saluda County, SC residents live below the federal poverty line, and unemployment runs at 3.6%. Both feed the economic-stress sub-score in our Eviction Risk Score model.
Scrub 50 years
Saluda County scores 2.5/10 (Low risk) on the EvictionRiskMap composite index. Scores across the county's three tracked cities range from 2.4 to 2.5/10, a narrow band reflecting consistent rural market conditions. Ranked 31st of 46 South Carolina counties - 30 counties carry higher eviction risk and 15 carry lower risk, placing Saluda in the lower-risk of the state.
How Saluda County ranks in South Carolina
Landlord guides for South Carolina
| City↕ | Population↕ | Risk↕ | % income on rent↕ | Average rent↕ | Lean↕ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Saluda | 3,055 | 2.5 | 33.7% | $816 | Rep |
| 002 | Ridge Spring | 842 | 2.5 | 22.8% | $640 | Rep |
| 003 | Ward | 260 | 2.4 | 51.0% | $922 | Rep |
County heatmap
One county, multiple regulatory regimes.
Saluda County sits in the western Piedmont of South Carolina, a rural county of roughly 4,157 renters anchored by the county seat of Saluda and the small communities of Ridge Spring and Ward. The county carries an eviction risk score of 2.5/10 (Low), placing it 31st out of 46 South Carolina counties - meaning 30 counties in the state carry higher risk than Saluda County. That positions Saluda firmly in the lower-risk of the state when it comes to tenant protectiveness and eviction pressure. Scores across the county's tracked places run from 2.4 to 2.5/10, a narrow band that reflects the county's consistent rural character and the absence of the court-density pressures found in larger metro areas.
The county seat, Saluda (population 3,055), scores 2.5/10 - the highest reading in the county and the hub for most of the county's rental activity. Average rents in the city run close to the countywide $787/month figure, and that number masks a significant rent burden: 32.6% of renter households in the county spend more than 30% of income on housing, a rate that edges above the national benchmark and reflects the combination of modest wages and limited rental supply typical of rural South Carolina. Ridge Spring, with a population of 842, scores 2.5/10, matching the county seat. Ward, the smallest tracked community at 260 residents, comes in slightly lower at 2.4/10, consistent with its more dispersed rental market.
The legal backdrop for landlord-tenant relationships in Saluda County is South Carolina's statewide framework under S.C. Code § 27-40 (the Residential Landlord and Tenant Act). South Carolina preempts local rent control, so no city or county in the state - Saluda included - can cap rent increases or require just-cause eviction. Landlords must give 5 days' notice for nonpayment of rent, 14 days' notice for a curable lease violation, and 30 days' notice for a no-cause end-of-term termination. Filing a summary ejectment action in magistrate court runs between $110 and $200 in court fees, with uncontested cases typically resolved in 21 to 45 days. That relatively swift process, combined with poverty rates averaging 36.6% among renter households, is what the composite score is measuring: a market where tenants face real financial fragility even when legal risk to landlords remains relatively contained by South Carolina's landlord-leaning statutory environment.
Saluda County's 2.5/10 score reflects a rural market where state law provides landlords a clear procedural framework - 5-day pay-or-quit notices, no rent caps, no just-cause requirement - while the high poverty rate (36.6%) and a 32.6% rent burden indicate that many renters operate with little financial cushion. The county's lower-risk standing in the state (31st of 46) puts it well below the concentrated-risk corridors of the Upstate and Lowcountry metro areas, but landlords should not read that as zero risk: thin renter budgets can translate into late-payment cycles even in low-volume rural courts.
Eviction filings in Saluda County
In September 2025, 16 eviction filings were recorded in Saluda County, 145.5% of the historical average (above average).1
- 16Sep 2025
- 145.5%of historical avg
- 1,645Renter households
- 19.4%Poverty rate
Historical eviction filings in Saluda County
From 2000 to 2015, eviction filings in Saluda County increased 154%. The peak was 190 filings in 2012.2
- 742000
- 190Peak (2012)
- 1882015
Data covers 2000–2018, the full span of the Princeton Eviction Lab's national county court-records dataset.
How Saluda County compares
Saluda County's 2.5/10 (Low) places it in the lower-risk of South Carolina's 46 counties - 31st overall - sitting below the statewide average of 2.5/10. Nearby peer counties in the same rural-Piedmont and Lowcountry tier, including McCormick, Lee, and Calhoun counties, all carry similarly modest scores in the low-risk range. Williamsburg County to the southeast scores noticeably higher, reflecting the higher poverty and court-volume pressures characteristic of the I-95 corridor. Saluda's score is tight to its peers, which makes sense: these are all small, landlord-statute-protected markets where the primary risk driver is not legal complexity but renter income instability.