Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #68,306 of 84,120 nationally

Carrington Place Eviction Risk: Lower , Boiling Springs

Tract 45083022405 · Spartanburg County, SC · pop 4,502 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi

Census tract 45083022405 belongs to Carrington Place in Boiling Springs, South Carolina. It is home to 4,502 residents and scores 4.6/10, a moderate reading for landlords. It lands near the 25th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

15% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a modest level, and 13% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,609 a month while the average household earns $88,102 a year, roughly 22% of income at the averages. About 24% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
2.4
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 4% Stable renters 20% Owners 76%
Tract context
Occupied units2,083
Renter share23.6%
SVI overall0.51
Poverty rate7.1%
Median income$88,102

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Carrington Place
Moderate
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Boiling Springs
Very Low
Within county
5 th percentile
Rank, 5th percentileLowHigh
#83 of 87 tracts In Spartanburg County
Very Low
Within state
14 th percentile
Rank, 14th percentileLowHigh
#1,135 of 1,317 tracts In South Carolina
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Boiling Springs and the region

Centroid at 35.0551, -81.9892 · click any tract to drill in

Why Carrington Place scores 2.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Boiling Springs
4.3
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.6
State political climate
South Carolina legislature & governorship
2.1
Economic stress
7.1% poverty · this tract
1.8
Supply constraint
$1,609 rent vs county FMR
8.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Boiling Springs
3.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Boiling Springs
5.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from Boiling Springs
4.1

How Carrington Place compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Carrington Place risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.42.4This tracttract 022405Boiling Springs: 2.32.3Boiling Springsparent cityCounty: 4.34.3Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.04.0Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 51

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 26Total filings over 1 yrs
  • 10.04%Avg annual filing rate
  • 10.0%Peak (2010)
  • 26Filings in 2010 (latest validated)
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Carrington Place

What moves this score most is supply constraint at 8.3/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Boiling Springs eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Spartanburg County average of 5.5 and below the South Carolina statewide average of 5.5. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 9.7% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 6.0% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 26 eviction filings here over 1 tracked years, with about 10.0% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 10.0% of renter households in 2010.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 45083022405

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 45083022405?

Census tract 45083022405 in the Carrington Place neighborhood scores 2.4/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 45083022405?

Median gross rent is $1,609/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 15% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 45083022405?

7.1% of residents in tract 45083022405 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,502.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 45083022405?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 51th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 33th, household 58th, minority 44th, housing 70th.
Q5

Is tract 45083022405 considered part of Carrington Place?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 45083022405 fall within Carrington Place (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 45083022405?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 26 eviction filings across 1 validated years in tract 45083022405 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 10.04% of renter households, peaking at 10.0% in 2010. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 45083022405 struggle to pay rent?

About 9.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 45083022405 compare to Boiling Springs overall?

Tract 45083022405 scores 2.4/10, right in line with the parent city of Boiling Springs at 2.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Boiling Springs eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Boiling Springs

Top eight tracts in Boiling Springs ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related