Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #22,213 of 84,120 nationally

Exum Eviction Risk: Moderate , Fairfield

Tract 01073010605 · Jefferson County, AL · pop 528 · neighborhood within 1.4 mi

Eviction risk in Exum in Fairfield centers on tract 01073010605, which scores 6.9/10 (Elevated tier) and is home to 528 residents. It lands near the 94th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

About 49% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 44% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $927 monthly, set against $43,988 in average yearly household income, roughly 25% of income at the averages. Renters make up 83% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
5.2
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 40% Stable renters 42% Owners 18%
Tract context
Occupied units299
Renter share82.9%
SVI overall0.41
Poverty rate39.0%
Median income$43,988

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Exum
Moderate
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 3 tracts In Fairfield
Very Low
Within county
63 th percentile
Rank, 63rd percentileLowHigh
#70 of 189 tracts In Jefferson County
Elevated
Within state
76 th percentile
Rank, 76th percentileLowHigh
#351 of 1,436 tracts In Alabama
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Fairfield and the region

Centroid at 33.4900, -86.9157 · click any tract to drill in

Why Exum scores 5.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Fairfield
6.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
Alabama legislature & governorship
1.8
Economic stress
39.0% poverty · this tract
9.7
Supply constraint
$927 rent vs county FMR
2.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Fairfield
9.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Fairfield
8.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Fairfield
9.4

How Exum compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Exum risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.25.2This tracttract 010605Fairfield: 2.62.6Fairfieldparent cityCounty: 4.14.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.14.1Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 41

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Exum

The heaviest input here is economic stress at 9.7/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Fairfield, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores well above the Jefferson County average of 5.3 and above the Alabama statewide average of 4.5. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

This tract overlaps land the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation redlined in the 1930s, a dominant grade of D ("Hazardous") across 30% of the tract. Redlining cut off mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class blocks, and those areas still tend to carry higher rent burden and eviction filings today.

The tract is predominantly Black and ranks around the 41st percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 01073010605

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 01073010605?

Census tract 01073010605 in the Exum neighborhood scores 5.2/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 01073010605?

Median gross rent is $927/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 49% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 01073010605?

39.0% of residents in tract 01073010605 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 528.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 01073010605?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 41th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 78th, household 20th, minority 92th, housing 5th.
Q5

Is tract 01073010605 considered part of Exum?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 01073010605 fall within Exum (neighborhood centroid within 1.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 01073010605 struggle to pay rent?

About 28.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 22.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 01073010605 compare to Fairfield overall?

Tract 01073010605 scores 5.2/10, higher than the parent city of Fairfield at 2.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Fairfield; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 01073010605 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 30% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Fairfield

Top eight tracts in Fairfield ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related