Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #18,163 of 84,120 nationally

Toulminville Eviction Risk: Elevated , Mobile

Tract 01097007700 · Mobile County, AL · pop 992 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi

01097007700 is a census tract in the Toulminville area of Prichard, AL. It scores 6/10 for landlords. It is home to 992 residents. 24% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, well below the Mobile County average of 43.6%.

Risk score
6
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 17% Stable renters 53% Owners 30%
Tract context
Occupied units428
Renter share69.9%
SVI overall0.70
Poverty rate37.1%
Median income$25,471

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 3 tracts In Toulminville
Very High
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#5 of 9 tracts In Mobile
Moderate
Within county
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 135 tracts In Mobile County
Very High
Within state
99 th percentile
Rank, 99th percentileLowHigh
#9 of 1,436 tracts In Alabama
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Mobile and the region

Centroid at 30.7298, -88.0840 · click any tract to drill in

Why Toulminville scores 6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Mobile
5.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.4
State political climate
Alabama legislature & governorship
1.8
Economic stress
37.1% poverty · this tract
9.3
Supply constraint
$645 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Mobile
8.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Mobile
8.8
Housing court bias
Inherited from Mobile
8.9

How Toulminville compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Toulminville risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 6.06.0This tracttract 007700Mobile: 3.63.6Mobileparent cityCounty: 4.04.0Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.04.0Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 70

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 102Total filings over 10 yrs
  • 3.39%Avg annual filing rate
  • 5.4%Peak (2001)
  • 7Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2001 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 010970077002001: 22 filings (5.38/100 renter HHs)2002: 21 filings (5.13/100 renter HHs)2006: 12 filings (4.00/100 renter HHs)2007: 8 filings (2.67/100 renter HHs)2008: 9 filings (3.00/100 renter HHs)2009: 8 filings (2.67/100 renter HHs)2013: 6 filings (3.23/100 renter HHs)2014: 3 filings (1.61/100 renter HHs)2015: 6 filings (3.23/100 renter HHs)2016: 7 filings (2.97/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 68% over the past 10 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Toulminville. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Toulminville

SNAP participation runs 44.2% against 15.2% nationally. The score leans hardest on economic stress at 9.3/10.

The poverty rate is 37%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest. Well under the midpoint, supply constraint reads 1/10. It sits 2.0 points above the Mobile County average of 4.0.

Running hot, housing-court posture reads 8.9/10. At $645 a month, rents run 30% under what the rest of Prichard commands.

70% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 24.8% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. The severe-burden share is 18%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.

The filing record is not thin: 102 evictions over 10 years of observation. The worst year on record was 2001, when 5.4% of renter households were served.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 01097007700

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 01097007700?

Census tract 01097007700 in the Toulminville neighborhood scores 6/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 01097007700?

Median gross rent is $645/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 24% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 01097007700?

37.1% of residents in tract 01097007700 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 992.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 01097007700?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 70th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 96th, household 4th, minority 100th, housing 55th.
Q5

Is tract 01097007700 considered part of Toulminville?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 01097007700 fall within Toulminville (neighborhood centroid within 0.9 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 01097007700?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 102 eviction filings across 10 validated years in tract 01097007700 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 3.39% of renter households, peaking at 5.4% in 2001. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 01097007700 struggle to pay rent?

About 31.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 24.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 01097007700 compare to Mobile overall?

Tract 01097007700 scores 6/10, higher than the parent city of Mobile at 3.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Mobile eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Mobile

Top eight tracts in Mobile ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related