Within parent city
100
th percentile
Very High
Census Tract · Ranked #59,654 of 84,120 nationally
Golden Shores Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 04015955002 · Mohave, AZ · pop 3,316 · 30% of tract blocks fall in Golden Shores
Census tract 04015955002 covers part of Golden Shores, AZ, and scores 3.4/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 3,316. Cost burden runs 15% here against 40.0% across Mohave County.
Risk score
3.4
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 5%
Stable renters 27%
Owners 68%
Tract context
Occupied units1,230
Renter share31.9%
SVI overall0.43
Poverty rate16.8%
Median income$67,782
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
49
th percentile
Moderate
Within state
49
th percentile
Moderate
National
29
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Golden Shores and the region
Centroid at 34.8164, -114.5388 · click any tract to drill in
Why Golden Shores scores 3.4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Golden Shores
3.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
2.4
State political climate
Arizona legislature & governorship
2.2
Economic stress
16.8% poverty · this tract
4.2
Supply constraint
$861 rent vs county FMR
1.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Golden Shores
7.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Golden Shores
9.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from Golden Shores
5.0
How Golden Shores compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 43
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 30%Socioeconomic
- 63%Household composition
- 58%Racial/ethnic minority
- 44%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 12.9%Housing insecurity
- 8.7%Utility-shutoff threat
- 18.6%Food insecurity
- 14.6%SNAP enrollment
- 9.8%Transit barriers
- 12.3%No health insurance
- 16.1%Frequent mental distress
- 38.6%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Golden Shores
What pushes it up most is tenant-organizing strength at 9.1/10. On the softer side, supply constraint reads 1.3/10.
Running cool, state political climate reads 2.2/10. Average gross rent is $861, 8% below the Golden Shores average.
That is riskier than roughly 29% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Social vulnerability reads 4.9/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.
Rent consumes only 15% of average household income of $67,782, an unusually wide affordability cushion. It tracks the Mohave County average of 3.7 closely.
32% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 04015955002
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 04015955002?
Census tract 04015955002 in Golden Shores scores 3.4/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 04015955002?
Median gross rent is $861/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 15% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 04015955002?
16.8% of residents in tract 04015955002 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,316.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 04015955002?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 43th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 30th, household 63th, minority 58th, housing 44th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 04015955002 struggle to pay rent?
About 12.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 04015955002 compare to Golden Shores overall?
Tract 04015955002 scores 3.4/10, right in line with the parent city of Golden Shores at 3.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Golden Shores; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Golden Shores
Top eight tracts in Golden Shores ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related