Within parent city
100
th percentile
Very High
Census Tract · Ranked #29,336 of 84,120 nationally
Siloam Springs Eviction Risk: Moderate
Tract 05007021202 · Benton County, AR · pop 3,419 · 90% of tract blocks fall in Siloam Springs
Census tract 05007021202 covers part of Siloam Springs, AR, and scores 5.2/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 3,419. The clearest offset is court filing pressure at 1.4/10.
Risk score
5.2
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 16%
Stable renters 28%
Owners 56%
Tract context
Occupied units1,285
Renter share43.2%
SVI overall0.89
Poverty rate16.6%
Median income$50,655
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
100
th percentile
Very High
Within state
92
th percentile
Very High
National
65
th percentile
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Siloam Springs and the region
Centroid at 36.1670, -94.5546 · click any tract to drill in
Why Siloam Springs scores 5.2
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Siloam Springs
4.3
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.7
State political climate
Arkansas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
16.6% poverty · this tract
4.2
Supply constraint
$759 rent vs county FMR
1.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Siloam Springs
4.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.8
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Siloam Springs
8.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Siloam Springs
5.5
How Siloam Springs compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 89
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 82%Socioeconomic
- 96%Household composition
- 60%Racial/ethnic minority
- 74%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 16.4%Housing insecurity
- 11.2%Utility-shutoff threat
- 21.8%Food insecurity
- 12.8%SNAP enrollment
- 11.4%Transit barriers
- 16.5%No health insurance
- 19.5%Frequent mental distress
- 39.2%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Siloam Springs
Well under the midpoint, state political climate reads 1.5/10. On the high side, tenant-organizing strength reads 8.5/10.
It sits 1.6 points above the Benton County average of 3.6. At $759 a month, rents run 24% under what the rest of Siloam Springs commands.
Cost burden runs 36% here against 30.1% across Benton County. Nationally it ranks #29,336 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 9/10.
Against average income of $50,655, annual rent is just 18%. Statewide the AR average is 3.8, so this tract runs 1.4 points hotter.
Of its three components the household composition measure is the most pressured. 43% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 05007021202
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 05007021202?
Census tract 05007021202 in Siloam Springs scores 5.2/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 05007021202?
Median gross rent is $759/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 36% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 05007021202?
16.6% of residents in tract 05007021202 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,419.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 05007021202?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 89th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 82th, household 96th, minority 60th, housing 74th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 05007021202 struggle to pay rent?
About 16.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 11.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 05007021202 compare to Siloam Springs overall?
Tract 05007021202 scores 5.2/10, higher than the parent city of Siloam Springs at 3.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Siloam Springs eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Siloam Springs
Top eight tracts in Siloam Springs ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related