Within parent city
25
th percentile
Low
Census Tract · Ranked #42,813 of 84,120 nationally
Siloam Springs Eviction Risk: Moderate
Tract 05007021313 · Benton County, AR · pop 2,813 · 8% of tract blocks fall in Siloam Springs
Census tract 05007021313 covers part of Siloam Springs, AR, and scores 4.4/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 2,813. The clearest offset is court filing pressure at 1.4/10.
Risk score
4.4
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 10%
Stable renters 37%
Owners 53%
Tract context
Occupied units1,220
Renter share47.7%
SVI overall0.48
Poverty rate6.8%
Median income$63,636
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
86
th percentile
High
Within state
75
th percentile
Elevated
National
49
th percentile
Moderate
Geographic context
Risk heat across Siloam Springs and the region
Centroid at 36.1454, -94.4550 · click any tract to drill in
Why Siloam Springs scores 4.4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Siloam Springs
4.3
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
3.7
State political climate
Arkansas legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
6.8% poverty · this tract
1.7
Supply constraint
$821 rent vs county FMR
2.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Siloam Springs
4.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.8
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Siloam Springs
8.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Siloam Springs
5.5
How Siloam Springs compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 48
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 49%Socioeconomic
- 54%Household composition
- 57%Racial/ethnic minority
- 36%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 11.5%Housing insecurity
- 7.9%Utility-shutoff threat
- 13.7%Food insecurity
- 7.2%SNAP enrollment
- 7.9%Transit barriers
- 9.8%No health insurance
- 17.7%Frequent mental distress
- 31.9%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Siloam Springs
Running cool, state political climate reads 1.5/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, tenant-organizing strength reads 8.5/10.
21% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, lower than the Benton County average of 30.1%. At $821 a month, rents run 18% under what the rest of Siloam Springs commands.
SNAP participation runs 7.2% against 15.2% nationally. It sits 0.8 points above the Benton County average of 3.6.
Nationally it ranks #42,813 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 5.3/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Against average income of $63,636, annual rent is just 15%.
48% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 05007021313
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 05007021313?
Census tract 05007021313 in Siloam Springs scores 4.4/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 05007021313?
Median gross rent is $821/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 21% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 05007021313?
6.8% of residents in tract 05007021313 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,813.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 05007021313?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 48th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 49th, household 54th, minority 57th, housing 36th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 05007021313 struggle to pay rent?
About 11.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 05007021313 compare to Siloam Springs overall?
Tract 05007021313 scores 4.4/10, higher than the parent city of Siloam Springs at 3.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Siloam Springs eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Siloam Springs
Top eight tracts in Siloam Springs ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related