Neighborhood · Ranked #10,224 of 84,120 nationally

Hoover-Foster Eviction Risk: Elevated , Oakland

Tract 06001401600 · Alameda, CA · pop 2,403 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi

Census tract 06001401600 sits in the Hoover-Foster neighborhood of Oakland, California. It has a population of 2,403 and an eviction-risk score of 6.5/10 (Elevated tier). 43% of renters here pay 30%+ of their household income on rent, with 15% severely cost-burdened (≥50%). Median gross rent is $2,195/month against a median household income of $135,234 — roughly 19% rent-to-income at the medians.

Risk score

6.5

Elevated

Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale

Household mix · 100 hh

Burdened renters 30% Stable renters 39% Owners 31%

Tract context

Occupied units969

Renter share68.8%

SVI overall0.81

Poverty rate13.2%

Median income$135,234

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Oakland and the region

Centroid at 37.8174, -122.2815 · click any tract to drill in

Why Hoover-Foster scores 6.5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly

Local political climate

Inherited from Oakland

9.7

Regional political climate

2024 county presidential margin

8.1

State political climate

California legislature & governorship

6.8

Economic stress

13.2% poverty · this tract

3.3

Supply constraint

$2,195 rent vs county FMR

3.2

Rent control risk

Inherited from Oakland

10.0

Eviction process difficulty

State law sets the calendar

9.5

Tenant organizing strength

Inherited from Oakland

9.5

Housing court bias

Inherited from Oakland

9.5

How Hoover-Foster compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.

CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 81

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

74%Socioeconomic
39%Household composition
86%Racial/ethnic minority
91%Housing & transportation

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D — Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

0%Grade A
0%Grade B
0%Grade C
94%Grade D · redlined

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org) — 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Hoover-Foster. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

17.4%Housing insecurity
9.7%Utility-shutoff threat
18.4%Food insecurity
17.7%SNAP enrollment
10.7%Transit barriers
8.5%No health insurance
19.4%Frequent mental distress
28.2%Any disability

Frequently asked

About tract 06001401600

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06001401600?

Census tract 06001401600 in the Hoover-Foster neighborhood scores 6.5/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.

What is the average rent in tract 06001401600?

Median gross rent is $2,195/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 43% of renter households are cost-burdened.

What is the poverty rate in tract 06001401600?

13.2% of residents in tract 06001401600 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,403.

How socially vulnerable is tract 06001401600?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 81th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 74th, household 39th, minority 86th, housing 91th.

Is tract 06001401600 considered part of Hoover-Foster?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06001401600 fall within Hoover-Foster (neighborhood centroid within 0.5 miles, OSM data).

What share of households in tract 06001401600 struggle to pay rent?

About 17.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 9.7% also reported utility shutoff threats — a frequent precursor to eviction filings.

How does tract 06001401600 compare to Oakland overall?

Tract 06001401600 scores 6.5/10 — lower than the parent city of Oakland at 9.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Oakland eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.

Was tract 06001401600 historically redlined?

Yes — this tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 94% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.

Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Oakland

Top eight tracts in Oakland ranked by composite eviction-risk score.