Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #1 of 84,120 nationally

Fruitvale Eviction Risk: High , Oakland

Tract 06001407101 · Alameda, CA · pop 4,053 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi

Tract 06001407101 sits in the Fruitvale area of Oakland eviction risk, CA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 9.9/10. 41% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.

Risk score
9.9
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 38% Stable renters 22% Owners 40%
Tract context
Occupied units1,135
Renter share60.4%
SVI overall0.89
Poverty rate13.3%
Median income$65,144

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#3 of 4 tracts In Fruitvale
Low
Within parent city
65 th percentile
Rank, 65th percentileLowHigh
#41 of 116 tracts In Oakland
Elevated
Within county
99 th percentile
Rank, 99th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 378 tracts In Alameda
Very High
Within state
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 9,109 tracts In California
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Oakland and the region

Centroid at 37.7831, -122.2144 · click any tract to drill in

Why Fruitvale scores 9.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Oakland
9.7
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.1
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
13.3% poverty · this tract
3.3
Supply constraint
$1,690 rent vs county FMR
1.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Oakland
10.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
9.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Oakland
9.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Oakland
9.5

How Fruitvale compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Fruitvale risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 9.99.9This tracttract 407101Oakland: 9.69.6Oaklandparent cityCounty: 7.87.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 89

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Fruitvale. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Fruitvale

63% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, well above the Alameda County average of 45.5%. The score leans hardest on rent-regulation exposure at 10/10. Running hot, local political climate reads 9.7/10.

Sitting well above the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10. It sits 2.1 points above the Alameda County average of 7.8. SNAP participation runs 30.2% against 15.2% nationally.

Housing insecurity runs 24.8% against 14.2% nationally. Average gross rent is $1,690, 15% below the Oakland average.

This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Oakland. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. That is riskier than roughly 100% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.

Social vulnerability reads 9/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 2.4 points hotter.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 06001407101

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06001407101?

Census tract 06001407101 in the Fruitvale neighborhood scores 9.9/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06001407101?

Median gross rent is $1,690/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 63% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06001407101?

13.3% of residents in tract 06001407101 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,053.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06001407101?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 89th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 98th, household 63th, minority 90th, housing 60th.
Q5

Is tract 06001407101 considered part of Fruitvale?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06001407101 fall within Fruitvale (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06001407101 struggle to pay rent?

About 24.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 13.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06001407101 compare to Oakland overall?

Tract 06001407101 scores 9.9/10, higher than the parent city of Oakland at 9.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Oakland eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06001407101 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 21% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Oakland

Top eight tracts in Oakland ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related