Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #13,812 of 84,120 nationally

East End Eviction Risk: Elevated , Alameda

Tract 06001428100 · Alameda, CA · pop 4,866 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi

With a score of 6.8/10, tract 06001428100 in the East End area of Alameda, CA reads elevated for landlord eviction risk. Cost burden runs 20% here against 45.5% across Alameda County.

Risk score
6.8
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 10% Stable renters 41% Owners 49%
Tract context
Occupied units1,844
Renter share51.2%
SVI overall0.36
Poverty rate4.8%
Median income$162,350

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In East End
Very Low
Within parent city
20 th percentile
Rank, 20th percentileLowHigh
#13 of 16 tracts In Alameda
Low
Within county
37 th percentile
Rank, 37th percentileLowHigh
#237 of 378 tracts In Alameda
Low
Within state
39 th percentile
Rank, 39th percentileLowHigh
#5,582 of 9,109 tracts In California
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Alameda and the region

Centroid at 37.7589, -122.2346 · click any tract to drill in

Why East End scores 6.8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Alameda
8.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.1
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
4.8% poverty · this tract
1.2
Supply constraint
$2,181 rent vs county FMR
3.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Alameda
5.1
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Alameda
9.2
Housing court bias
Inherited from Alameda
4.5

How East End compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
East End risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 6.86.8This tracttract 428100Alameda: 7.87.8Alamedaparent cityCounty: 7.87.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 36

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within East End. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in East End

The score leans hardest on tenant-organizing strength at 9.2/10. On the softer side, economic stress reads 1.2/10. Running hot, regional political climate reads 8.1/10.

The severe-burden share is 11%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. Against the Alameda County average of 7.8, this tract reads safer for landlords by 1.0 points. Food insecurity runs 8.6% against 17.8% nationally.

SNAP participation runs 7.2% against 15.2% nationally. Average gross rent is $2,181, 12% below the Alameda average. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.

Nationally it ranks #13,812 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 4.3/10.

Against average income of $162,350, annual rent is just 16%. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured.

Poverty sits at 5%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 06001428100

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06001428100?

Census tract 06001428100 in the East End neighborhood scores 6.8/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06001428100?

Median gross rent is $2,181/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 20% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06001428100?

4.8% of residents in tract 06001428100 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,866.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06001428100?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 36th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 8th, household 54th, minority 65th, housing 66th.
Q5

Is tract 06001428100 considered part of East End?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06001428100 fall within East End (neighborhood centroid within 0.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06001428100 struggle to pay rent?

About 8.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06001428100 compare to Alameda overall?

Tract 06001428100 scores 6.8/10, lower than the parent city of Alameda at 7.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Alameda; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06001428100 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Alameda

Top eight tracts in Alameda ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related