Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #14,308 of 84,120 nationally

Brookfield Village Eviction Risk: Elevated , Oakland

Tract 06001432300 · Alameda, CA · pop 4,874 · neighborhood within 1.2 mi

With a score of 6.7/10, tract 06001432300 in the Brookfield Village area of San Leandro, CA reads elevated for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 4,874. The main counterweight is economic stress at 1.6/10.

Risk score
6.7
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 10% Stable renters 15% Owners 75%
Tract context
Occupied units1,754
Renter share24.9%
SVI overall0.44
Poverty rate6.3%
Median income$156,531

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 4 tracts In Brookfield Village
Very Low
Within parent city
17 th percentile
Rank, 17th percentileLowHigh
#16 of 19 tracts In Oakland
Very Low
Within county
37 th percentile
Rank, 37th percentileLowHigh
#240 of 378 tracts In Alameda
Low
Within state
37 th percentile
Rank, 37th percentileLowHigh
#5,752 of 9,109 tracts In California
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Oakland and the region

Centroid at 37.7309, -122.1657 · click any tract to drill in

Why Brookfield Village scores 6.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Oakland
8.3
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.1
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
6.3% poverty · this tract
1.6
Supply constraint
$1,938 rent vs county FMR
2.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Oakland
7.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.8
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Oakland
8.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Oakland
6.0

How Brookfield Village compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Brookfield Village risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 6.76.7This tracttract 432300Oakland: 9.69.6Oaklandparent cityCounty: 7.87.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 44

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Brookfield Village. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Brookfield Village

On the high side, local political climate reads 8.3/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, tenant-organizing strength reads 8.3/10. The severe-burden share is 17%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.

It sits 1.1 points below the Alameda County average of 7.8. Against Alameda County at 45.5%, 41% of renters here are cost-burdened. Average gross rent is $1,938, 11% below the San Leandro average.

In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground B ("Still Desirable"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. Nationally it ranks #14,308 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

At 25% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. Social vulnerability reads 5/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Rent consumes only 15% of average household income of $156,531, an unusually wide affordability cushion.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 06001432300

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06001432300?

Census tract 06001432300 in the Brookfield Village neighborhood scores 6.7/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06001432300?

Median gross rent is $1,938/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 41% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06001432300?

6.3% of residents in tract 06001432300 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,874.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06001432300?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 44th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 40th, household 31th, minority 82th, housing 44th.
Q5

Is tract 06001432300 considered part of Brookfield Village?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06001432300 fall within Brookfield Village (neighborhood centroid within 1.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06001432300 struggle to pay rent?

About 13.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06001432300 compare to Oakland overall?

Tract 06001432300 scores 6.7/10, lower than the parent city of Oakland at 9.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Oakland eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06001432300 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 6% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Oakland

Top eight tracts in Oakland ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related