Within neighborhood
0
th percentile
Very Low
Neighborhood · Ranked #35,899 of 84,120 nationally
Camelback Eviction Risk: Moderate , Concord
Tract 06013321200 · Contra Costa, CA · pop 5,616 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi
The Camelback neighborhood of Concord is where census tract 06013321200 sits, home to 5,616 residents. Its landlord eviction-risk score is 5.4/10. That is riskier than roughly 55% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 42% of renter households, a severe level, and 17% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $2,324 monthly, set against $105,100 in average yearly household income, roughly 27% of income at the averages. About 59% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.
Risk score
4.3
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 25%
Stable renters 34%
Owners 41%
Tract context
Occupied units2,372
Renter share59.3%
SVI overall0.53
Poverty rate11.6%
Median income$105,100
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Within county
60
th percentile
Elevated
Within state
27
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Concord and the region
Centroid at 37.9821, -122.0714 · click any tract to drill in
Why Camelback scores 4.3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Concord
7.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.3
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
11.6% poverty · this tract
2.9
Supply constraint
$2,324 rent vs county FMR
3.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Concord
4.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Concord
5.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from Concord
4.9
How Camelback compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 53
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 46%Socioeconomic
- 44%Household composition
- 73%Racial/ethnic minority
- 53%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Camelback. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 11.4%Housing insecurity
- 5.9%Utility-shutoff threat
- 13.3%Food insecurity
- 11.2%SNAP enrollment
- 7.8%Transit barriers
- 7.1%No health insurance
- 17.2%Frequent mental distress
- 26.2%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Camelback
The heaviest input here is eviction process difficulty at 6.3/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Concord eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Contra Costa County average of 5.7 and below the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 11.4% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 5.9% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
The tract is White and Asian and ranks around the 53rd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 06013321200
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06013321200?
Census tract 06013321200 in the Camelback neighborhood scores 4.3/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06013321200?
Median gross rent is $2,324/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 42% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06013321200?
11.6% of residents in tract 06013321200 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,616.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06013321200?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 53th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 46th, household 44th, minority 73th, housing 53th.
Q5
Is tract 06013321200 considered part of Camelback?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06013321200 fall within Camelback (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 06013321200 struggle to pay rent?
About 11.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 06013321200 compare to Concord overall?
Tract 06013321200 scores 4.3/10, lower than the parent city of Concord at 8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Concord eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related