Within parent city
83
th percentile
High
Census Tract · Ranked #48,083 of 84,120 nationally
Rosedale Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 06029003819 · Kern, CA · pop 4,600 · 60% of tract blocks fall in Rosedale
How risky is Rosedale for landlords? Census tract 06029003819 scores 6.2/10, the Elevated tier. That is riskier than about 82% of US census tracts.
About 55% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 53% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,238 monthly, set against $104,706 in average yearly household income, roughly 14% of income at the averages. About 27% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
3.6
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 15%
Stable renters 12%
Owners 73%
Tract context
Occupied units1,396
Renter share26.9%
SVI overall0.58
Poverty rate12.8%
Median income$104,706
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
4
th percentile
Very Low
Within state
16
th percentile
Very Low
National
43
th percentile
Moderate
Geographic context
Risk heat across Rosedale and the region
Centroid at 35.3762, -119.1544 · click any tract to drill in
Why Rosedale scores 3.6
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Rosedale
5.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.5
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
12.8% poverty · this tract
3.2
Supply constraint
$1,238 rent vs county FMR
4.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Rosedale
7.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Rosedale
3.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Rosedale
5.6
How Rosedale compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 58
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 55%Socioeconomic
- 41%Household composition
- 55%Racial/ethnic minority
- 65%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 12.3%Housing insecurity
- 7.0%Utility-shutoff threat
- 15.1%Food insecurity
- 14.7%SNAP enrollment
- 8.5%Transit barriers
- 8.0%No health insurance
- 17.4%Frequent mental distress
- 31.4%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Rosedale
The heaviest input here is rent-control risk at 7.9/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Rosedale, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Kern County average of 6.1 and in line with the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 58th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
In CDC survey modeling, about 12.3% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 7.0% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
Frequently asked
About tract 06029003819
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06029003819?
Census tract 06029003819 in Rosedale scores 3.6/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06029003819?
Median gross rent is $1,238/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 55% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06029003819?
12.8% of residents in tract 06029003819 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,600.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06029003819?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 58th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 55th, household 41th, minority 55th, housing 65th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 06029003819 struggle to pay rent?
About 12.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 06029003819 compare to Rosedale overall?
Tract 06029003819 scores 3.6/10, lower than the parent city of Rosedale at 7.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Rosedale; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Rosedale
Top eight tracts in Rosedale ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related