Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #26,446 of 84,120 nationally

Upper Lake Eviction Risk: Moderate

Tract 06033000100 · Lake, CA · pop 3,529 · 4% of tract blocks fall in Upper Lake

Landlord eviction risk in census tract 06033000100 (Upper Lake, California) comes in at 5.2/10, the Moderate tier. That is riskier than roughly 47% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 14% of renter households, a modest level, and 6% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average household income is about $81,458 a year. About 17% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
4.9
Moderate
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 2% Stable renters 14% Owners 84%
Tract context
Occupied units1,221
Renter share17.0%
SVI overall0.81
Poverty rate19.6%
Median income$81,458

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Upper Lake
Moderate
Within county
25 th percentile
Rank, 25th percentileLowHigh
#16 of 21 tracts In Lake
Low
Within state
37 th percentile
Rank, 37th percentileLowHigh
#5,726 of 9,109 tracts In California
Low
National
69 th percentile
Rank, 69th percentileLowHigh
#26,446 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Upper Lake and the region

Centroid at 39.3332, -122.8987 · click any tract to drill in

Why Upper Lake scores 4.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Upper Lake
5.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.3
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
19.6% poverty · this tract
4.9
Supply constraint
tract rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Upper Lake
5.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Upper Lake
2.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Upper Lake
4.5

How Upper Lake compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Upper Lake risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.94.9This tracttract 000100Upper Lake: 7.77.7Upper Lakeparent cityCounty: 6.36.3Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.65.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 81

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 16Total filings over 3 yrs
  • 1.22%Avg annual filing rate
  • 1.8%Peak (2011)
  • 4Filings in 2014 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2011 to 2014
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 060330001002011: 8 filings (1.83/100 renter HHs)2012: 4 filings (0.91/100 renter HHs)2014: 4 filings (0.91/100 renter HHs)
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Upper Lake

The heaviest input here is eviction process difficulty at 6.9/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Upper Lake, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Lake County average of 6.4 and below the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 14.7% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 8.8% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 16 eviction filings here over 3 tracked years, with about 1.2% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 1.8% of renter households in 2011.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 06033000100

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06033000100?

Census tract 06033000100 in Upper Lake scores 4.9/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the poverty rate in tract 06033000100?

19.6% of residents in tract 06033000100 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,529.
Q3

How socially vulnerable is tract 06033000100?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 81th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 76th, household 84th, minority 53th, housing 75th.
Q4

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 06033000100?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 16 eviction filings across 3 validated years in tract 06033000100 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.22% of renter households, peaking at 1.8% in 2011. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q5

What share of households in tract 06033000100 struggle to pay rent?

About 14.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6

How does tract 06033000100 compare to Upper Lake overall?

Tract 06033000100 scores 4.9/10, lower than the parent city of Upper Lake at 7.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Upper Lake; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related