Neighborhood · Ranked #2,922 of 84,120 nationally

Pacoima Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles

Tract 06037104610 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 3,122 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi

With a score of 9.4/10, tract 06037104610 in the Pacoima area of Los Angeles, CA reads high for landlord eviction risk. It is home to 3,122 residents. Against Los Angeles County at 53.8%, 73% of renters here are cost-burdened.

Risk score

9.4

High

Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale

Household mix · 100 hh

Burdened renters 30% Stable renters 11% Owners 59%

Tract context

Occupied units652

Renter share40.8%

SVI overall0.85

Poverty rate8.7%

Median income$86,220

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region

Centroid at 34.2604, -118.4190 · click any tract to drill in

Why Pacoima scores 9.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly

Local political climate

Inherited from Los Angeles

9.5

Regional political climate

2024 county presidential margin

7.2

State political climate

California legislature & governorship

6.8

Economic stress

8.7% poverty · this tract

2.2

Supply constraint

$1,843 rent vs county FMR

2.0

Rent control risk

Inherited from Los Angeles

10.0

Eviction process difficulty

State law sets the calendar

9.5

Tenant organizing strength

Inherited from Los Angeles

9.5

Housing court bias

Inherited from Los Angeles

9.0

How Pacoima compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.

CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 85

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

73%Socioeconomic
90%Household composition
97%Racial/ethnic minority
70%Housing & transportation

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

0%Grade A
0%Grade B
0%Grade C
6%Grade D · redlined

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Pacoima. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

27.1%Housing insecurity
10.6%Utility-shutoff threat
32.3%Food insecurity
25.8%SNAP enrollment
14.6%Transit barriers
23.2%No health insurance
18.3%Frequent mental distress
38.2%Any disability

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Pacoima

What pushes it up most is rent-regulation exposure at 10/10. On the high side, local political climate reads 9.5/10. Running hot, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10.

Severe burden reaches 20%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Food insecurity runs 32.3% against 17.8% nationally. Housing insecurity runs 27.1% against 14.2% nationally.

Against the Los Angeles County average of 8.4, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.0 points. This ground was mapped D ("Hazardous") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Los Angeles. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. That is riskier than roughly 97% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.

Social vulnerability reads 8.7/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.9 points hotter. Of its three components the household composition measure is the most pressured.

Average gross rent is $1,843, close to the Los Angeles average. Annual rent works out to 26% of average household income of $86,220.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037104610

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037104610?

Census tract 06037104610 in the Pacoima neighborhood scores 9.4/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.

What is the average rent in tract 06037104610?

Median gross rent is $1,843/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 73% of renter households are cost-burdened.

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037104610?

8.7% of residents in tract 06037104610 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,122.

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037104610?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 85th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 73th, household 90th, minority 97th, housing 70th.

Is tract 06037104610 considered part of Pacoima?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037104610 fall within Pacoima (neighborhood centroid within 0.5 miles, OSM data).

What share of households in tract 06037104610 struggle to pay rent?

About 27.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 10.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.

How does tract 06037104610 compare to Los Angeles overall?

Tract 06037104610 scores 9.4/10, lower than the parent city of Los Angeles at 9.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Los Angeles eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.

Was tract 06037104610 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 6% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.

Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles

Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.