Neighborhood · Ranked #2,210 of 84,120 nationally

Larchmont Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles

Tract 06037191902 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 2,836 · neighborhood within 1.2 mi

Census tract 06037191902 covers part of the Larchmont area of Los Angeles, CA, and scores 9.8/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 2,836. The score leans hardest on rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.

Risk score

9.8

High

Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale

Household mix · 100 hh

Burdened renters 37% Stable renters 20% Owners 43%

Tract context

Occupied units1,532

Renter share57.6%

SVI overall0.37

Poverty rate13.2%

Median income$87,750

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region

Centroid at 34.0838, -118.3388 · click any tract to drill in

Why Larchmont scores 9.8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly

Local political climate

Inherited from Los Angeles

9.5

Regional political climate

2024 county presidential margin

7.2

State political climate

California legislature & governorship

6.8

Economic stress

13.2% poverty · this tract

3.3

Supply constraint

$2,365 rent vs county FMR

4.0

Rent control risk

Inherited from Los Angeles

10.0

Eviction process difficulty

State law sets the calendar

9.5

Tenant organizing strength

Inherited from Los Angeles

9.5

Housing court bias

Inherited from Los Angeles

9.0

How Larchmont compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.

CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 37

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

56%Socioeconomic
14%Household composition
47%Racial/ethnic minority
35%Housing & transportation

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

0%Grade A
28%Grade B
66%Grade C
0%Grade D · redlined

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Larchmont. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

9.5%Housing insecurity
4.7%Utility-shutoff threat
9.7%Food insecurity
9.0%SNAP enrollment
6.0%Transit barriers
4.6%No health insurance
15.5%Frequent mental distress
22.9%Any disability

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Larchmont

32% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. Sitting well above the midpoint, local political climate reads 9.5/10.

Running hot, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10. roughly two in three of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, well above the Los Angeles County average of 53.8%. Set annual rent against average income of $87,750 and the ratio lands at 32%, above the conventional 30% ceiling.

Against the Los Angeles County average of 8.4, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.4 points. Average gross rent is $2,365, 22% above the Los Angeles average.

Food insecurity runs 9.7% against 17.8% nationally. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. Nationally it ranks #2,210 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 4.3/10. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 2.3 points hotter.

Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured. 58% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037191902

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037191902?

Census tract 06037191902 in the Larchmont neighborhood scores 9.8/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.

What is the average rent in tract 06037191902?

Median gross rent is $2,365/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 65% of renter households are cost-burdened.

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037191902?

13.2% of residents in tract 06037191902 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,836.

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037191902?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 37th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 56th, household 14th, minority 47th, housing 35th.

Is tract 06037191902 considered part of Larchmont?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037191902 fall within Larchmont (neighborhood centroid within 1.2 miles, OSM data).

What share of households in tract 06037191902 struggle to pay rent?

About 9.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.

How does tract 06037191902 compare to Los Angeles overall?

Tract 06037191902 scores 9.8/10, right in line with the parent city of Los Angeles at 9.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Los Angeles eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.

Was tract 06037191902 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.

Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles

Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.