Rose Hill Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles
Tract 06037199202 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 2,594 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi
With a score of 9.7/10, tract 06037199202 in the Rose Hill area of Los Angeles, CA reads high for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 2,594. What pushes it up most is rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region
Centroid at 34.0813, -118.2033 · click any tract to drill in
Why Rose Hill scores 9.7
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Rose Hill compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 96
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 91%Socioeconomic
- 87%Household composition
- 84%Racial/ethnic minority
- 92%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 85%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Rose Hill. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 20.1%Housing insecurity
- 8.1%Utility-shutoff threat
- 23.4%Food insecurity
- 18.7%SNAP enrollment
- 11.1%Transit barriers
- 15.3%No health insurance
- 16.7%Frequent mental distress
- 31.9%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Rose Hill
Sitting well above the midpoint, local political climate reads 9.5/10. Running hot, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10. Against Los Angeles County at 53.8%, 45% of renters here are cost-burdened.
At $1,500 a month, rents run 22% under what the rest of Los Angeles commands. It sits 1.3 points above the Los Angeles County average of 8.4.
14% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.
Nationally it ranks #2,339 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 9.6/10.
Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 2.2 points hotter. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the most pressured. Annual rent works out to 18% of average household income of $98,083.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
About tract 06037199202
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037199202?
What is the average rent in tract 06037199202?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06037199202?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06037199202?
Is tract 06037199202 considered part of Rose Hill?
What share of households in tract 06037199202 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06037199202 compare to Los Angeles overall?
Was tract 06037199202 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles
Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.