Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #2,339 of 84,120 nationally

Rose Hill Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles

Tract 06037199202 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 2,594 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi

With a score of 9.7/10, tract 06037199202 in the Rose Hill area of Los Angeles, CA reads high for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 2,594. What pushes it up most is rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.

Risk score
9.7
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 20% Stable renters 24% Owners 56%
Tract context
Occupied units893
Renter share43.3%
SVI overall0.96
Poverty rate15.0%
Median income$98,083

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
67 th percentile
Rank, 67th percentileLowHigh
#4 of 10 tracts In Rose Hill
Elevated
Within parent city
42 th percentile
Rank, 42nd percentileLowHigh
#649 of 1,117 tracts In Los Angeles
Moderate
Within county
68 th percentile
Rank, 68th percentileLowHigh
#795 of 2,495 tracts In Los Angeles
Elevated
Within state
88 th percentile
Rank, 88th percentileLowHigh
#1,125 of 9,109 tracts In California
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region

Centroid at 34.0813, -118.2033 · click any tract to drill in

Why Rose Hill scores 9.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
15.0% poverty · this tract
3.8
Supply constraint
$1,500 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Los Angeles
10.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
9.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.0

How Rose Hill compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Rose Hill risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 9.79.7This tracttract 199202Los Angeles: 9.89.8Los Angelesparent cityCounty: 8.48.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 96

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Rose Hill. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Rose Hill

Sitting well above the midpoint, local political climate reads 9.5/10. Running hot, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10. Against Los Angeles County at 53.8%, 45% of renters here are cost-burdened.

At $1,500 a month, rents run 22% under what the rest of Los Angeles commands. It sits 1.3 points above the Los Angeles County average of 8.4.

14% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.

Nationally it ranks #2,339 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 9.6/10.

Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 2.2 points hotter. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the most pressured. Annual rent works out to 18% of average household income of $98,083.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037199202

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037199202?

Census tract 06037199202 in the Rose Hill neighborhood scores 9.7/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06037199202?

Median gross rent is $1,500/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 45% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037199202?

15.0% of residents in tract 06037199202 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,594.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037199202?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 96th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 91th, household 87th, minority 84th, housing 92th.
Q5

Is tract 06037199202 considered part of Rose Hill?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037199202 fall within Rose Hill (neighborhood centroid within 0.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06037199202 struggle to pay rent?

About 20.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06037199202 compare to Los Angeles overall?

Tract 06037199202 scores 9.7/10, right in line with the parent city of Los Angeles at 9.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Los Angeles eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06037199202 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 85% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles

Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related