Rose Hill Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles
Tract 06037199802 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 2,064 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi
With a score of 9.9/10, tract 06037199802 in the Rose Hill area of Los Angeles, CA reads high for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 2,064. What pushes it up most is rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region
Centroid at 34.0722, -118.2096 · click any tract to drill in
Why Rose Hill scores 9.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Rose Hill compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 74
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 89%Socioeconomic
- 41%Household composition
- 96%Racial/ethnic minority
- 41%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 82%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Rose Hill. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 22.7%Housing insecurity
- 9.3%Utility-shutoff threat
- 32.6%Food insecurity
- 27.0%SNAP enrollment
- 14.0%Transit barriers
- 17.8%No health insurance
- 16.9%Frequent mental distress
- 37.5%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Rose Hill
32% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. Running hot, local political climate reads 9.5/10. On the high side, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10.
71% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. Food insecurity runs 32.6% against 17.8% nationally. It sits 1.5 points above the Los Angeles County average of 8.4.
Average gross rent is $1,488, 23% below the Los Angeles average. SNAP participation runs 27.0% against 15.2% nationally.
This ground was mapped D ("Hazardous") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Los Angeles. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. Nationally it ranks #1 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
Social vulnerability reads 7.7/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 2.4 points hotter.
Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the most pressured.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
About tract 06037199802
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037199802?
What is the average rent in tract 06037199802?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06037199802?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06037199802?
Is tract 06037199802 considered part of Rose Hill?
What share of households in tract 06037199802 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06037199802 compare to Los Angeles overall?
Was tract 06037199802 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles
Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.