Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #4,036 of 84,120 nationally

Baird Park Eviction Risk: Elevated , Los Angeles

Tract 06037201301 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 3,433 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi

The Elevated-tier score of 6.4/10 for census tract 06037201301 reflects conditions in the Baird Park area of Los Angeles, California. On the national scale it ranks #11,823 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

About 29% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a moderate level, and 25% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,185 a month against an average household income of $94,926 a year, roughly 15% of income at the averages. Renters make up 52% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
7.2
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 15% Stable renters 36% Owners 49%
Tract context
Occupied units1,073
Renter share51.5%
SVI overall0.83
Poverty rate15.6%
Median income$94,926

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 3 tracts In Baird Park
Very High
Within parent city
45 th percentile
Rank, 45th percentileLowHigh
#611 of 1,117 tracts In Los Angeles
Moderate
Within county
61 th percentile
Rank, 61st percentileLowHigh
#983 of 2,495 tracts In Los Angeles
Elevated
Within state
80 th percentile
Rank, 80th percentileLowHigh
#1,838 of 9,109 tracts In California
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region

Centroid at 34.0882, -118.1878 · click any tract to drill in

Why Baird Park scores 7.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
15.6% poverty · this tract
3.9
Supply constraint
$1,185 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Los Angeles
10.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
9.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.0

How Baird Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Baird Park risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 7.27.2This tracttract 201301Los Angeles: 9.99.9Los Angelesparent cityCounty: 6.76.7Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.65.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 83

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Baird Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Baird Park

The heaviest input here is rent-control risk at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Los Angeles eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Los Angeles County average of 6.5 and above the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 20.4% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 8.7% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

This tract overlaps land the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation redlined in the 1930s, a dominant grade of D ("Hazardous") across 38% of the tract. Redlining cut off mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class blocks, and those areas still tend to carry higher rent burden and eviction filings today.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037201301

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037201301?

Census tract 06037201301 in the Baird Park neighborhood scores 7.2/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06037201301?

Median gross rent is $1,185/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 29% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037201301?

15.6% of residents in tract 06037201301 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,433.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037201301?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 83th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 61th, household 80th, minority 92th, housing 88th.
Q5

Is tract 06037201301 considered part of Baird Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037201301 fall within Baird Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06037201301 struggle to pay rent?

About 20.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06037201301 compare to Los Angeles overall?

Tract 06037201301 scores 7.2/10, lower than the parent city of Los Angeles at 9.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Los Angeles eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06037201301 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 38% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles

Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related