Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #1 of 84,120 nationally

Little Bangladesh Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles

Tract 06037211202 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 2,307 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi

06037211202 is a census tract in the Little Bangladesh area of Los Angeles, CA. It scores 9.9/10 for landlords. Population here is 2,307. The dominant input is rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.

Risk score
9.9
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 48% Stable renters 49% Owners 3%
Tract context
Occupied units1,039
Renter share97.4%
SVI overall0.84
Poverty rate19.3%
Median income$51,627

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
13 th percentile
Rank, 13th percentileLowHigh
#22 of 25 tracts In Little Bangladesh
Very Low
Within parent city
57 th percentile
Rank, 57th percentileLowHigh
#477 of 1,117 tracts In Los Angeles
Elevated
Within county
87 th percentile
Rank, 87th percentileLowHigh
#338 of 2,495 tracts In Los Angeles
High
Within state
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 9,109 tracts In California
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region

Centroid at 34.0745, -118.2941 · click any tract to drill in

Why Little Bangladesh scores 9.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
19.3% poverty · this tract
4.8
Supply constraint
$1,348 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Los Angeles
10.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
9.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.0

How Little Bangladesh compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Little Bangladesh risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 9.99.9This tracttract 211202Los Angeles: 9.89.8Los Angelesparent cityCounty: 8.48.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 84

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Little Bangladesh. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Little Bangladesh

This is renter territory: 97% of occupied units are tenant-occupied. 30% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. Running hot, local political climate reads 9.5/10.

Sitting well above the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10. At $1,348 a month, rents run 30% under what the rest of Los Angeles commands.

Against the Los Angeles County average of 8.4, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.5 points. The poverty rate is 19%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest.

50% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, lower than the Los Angeles County average of 53.8%. Food insecurity runs 25.2% against 17.8% nationally. This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Los Angeles. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.

Nationally it ranks #1 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 8.5/10. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 2.4 points hotter.

Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the most pressured.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037211202

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037211202?

Census tract 06037211202 in the Little Bangladesh neighborhood scores 9.9/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06037211202?

Median gross rent is $1,348/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 50% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037211202?

19.3% of residents in tract 06037211202 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,307.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037211202?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 84th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 94th, household 26th, minority 91th, housing 77th.
Q5

Is tract 06037211202 considered part of Little Bangladesh?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037211202 fall within Little Bangladesh (neighborhood centroid within 0.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06037211202 struggle to pay rent?

About 20.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 9.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06037211202 compare to Los Angeles overall?

Tract 06037211202 scores 9.9/10, right in line with the parent city of Los Angeles at 9.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Los Angeles eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06037211202 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles

Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related