Little Bangladesh Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles
Tract 06037211310 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 3,330 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi
Census tract 06037211310 covers part of the Little Bangladesh area of Los Angeles, CA, and scores 9.9/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 3,330 residents. 39% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region
Centroid at 34.0709, -118.2985 · click any tract to drill in
Why Little Bangladesh scores 9.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Little Bangladesh compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 95
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 99%Socioeconomic
- 45%Household composition
- 90%Racial/ethnic minority
- 95%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 100%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Little Bangladesh. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 23.9%Housing insecurity
- 11.3%Utility-shutoff threat
- 30.8%Food insecurity
- 28.3%SNAP enrollment
- 14.7%Transit barriers
- 16.3%No health insurance
- 17.8%Frequent mental distress
- 34.2%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Little Bangladesh
The score leans hardest on rent-regulation exposure at 10/10. Running hot, local political climate reads 9.5/10.
This is renter territory: 92% of occupied units are tenant-occupied. On the high side, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10. Set annual rent against average income of $46,966 and the ratio lands at 39%, above the conventional 30% ceiling.
around two-thirds of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, well above the Los Angeles County average of 53.8%. The poverty rate is 27%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment.
Against the Los Angeles County average of 8.4, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 1.5 points. SNAP participation runs 28.3% against 15.2% nationally. At $1,524 a month, rents run 21% under what the rest of Los Angeles commands.
Housing insecurity runs 23.9% against 14.2% nationally. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.
On the national scale it lands near the 100th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 9.6/10.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
About tract 06037211310
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037211310?
What is the average rent in tract 06037211310?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06037211310?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06037211310?
Is tract 06037211310 considered part of Little Bangladesh?
What share of households in tract 06037211310 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06037211310 compare to Los Angeles overall?
Was tract 06037211310 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles
Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.