Saint James Park Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles
Tract 06037222700 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 4,094 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi
With a score of 9.9/10, tract 06037222700 in the Saint James Park area of Los Angeles, CA reads high for landlord eviction risk. The severe-burden share is 46%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region
Centroid at 34.0209, -118.2857 · click any tract to drill in
Why Saint James Park scores 9.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Saint James Park compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 61
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 65%Socioeconomic
- 1%Household composition
- 75%Racial/ethnic minority
- 98%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 12%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Saint James Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 26.3%Housing insecurity
- 15.1%Utility-shutoff threat
- 38.0%Food insecurity
- 40.4%SNAP enrollment
- 22.0%Transit barriers
- 9.9%No health insurance
- 28.0%Frequent mental distress
- 37.6%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Saint James Park
What pushes it up most is rent-regulation exposure at 10/10. SNAP participation runs 40.4% against 15.2% nationally.
The poverty rate is 62%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment. Sitting well above the midpoint, economic stress reads 10/10.
100% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. Annualized rent equals 43% of average household income of $51,250, past the 30% affordability line, which thins the margin any screening standard has to work with. On the high side, local political climate reads 9.5/10.
Against Los Angeles County at 53.8%, 67% of renters here are cost-burdened. It sits 1.5 points above the Los Angeles County average of 8.4.
Inability to pay a utility bill runs 15.1% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.
That is riskier than roughly 100% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 6.5/10.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
About tract 06037222700
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037222700?
What is the average rent in tract 06037222700?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06037222700?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06037222700?
Is tract 06037222700 considered part of Saint James Park?
What share of households in tract 06037222700 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06037222700 compare to Los Angeles overall?
Was tract 06037222700 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles
Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.