Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #5,730 of 84,120 nationally

Tehrangeles Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles

Tract 06037265524 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 2,864 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi

Census tract 06037265524 covers part of the Tehrangeles area of Los Angeles, CA, and scores 8.4/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 2,864 residents. The score leans hardest on rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.

Risk score
8.4
High
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 40% Stable renters 32% Owners 28%
Tract context
Occupied units1,358
Renter share72.7%
SVI overall0.23
Poverty rate4.4%
Median income$118,005

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
14 th percentile
Rank, 14th percentileLowHigh
#7 of 8 tracts In Tehrangeles
Very Low
Within parent city
7 th percentile
Rank, 7th percentileLowHigh
#1,034 of 1,117 tracts In Los Angeles
Very Low
Within county
40 th percentile
Rank, 40th percentileLowHigh
#1,490 of 2,495 tracts In Los Angeles
Moderate
Within state
70 th percentile
Rank, 70th percentileLowHigh
#2,744 of 9,109 tracts In California
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region

Centroid at 34.0509, -118.4453 · click any tract to drill in

Why Tehrangeles scores 8.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
4.4% poverty · this tract
1.1
Supply constraint
$3,104 rent vs county FMR
6.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Los Angeles
10.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
9.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Los Angeles
9.0

How Tehrangeles compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Tehrangeles risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 8.48.4This tracttract 265524Los Angeles: 9.89.8Los Angelesparent cityCounty: 8.48.4Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.57.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 23

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Tehrangeles. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Tehrangeles

At $3,104 a month, rents run 61% over what the rest of Los Angeles commands. 32% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.

Sitting well above the midpoint, local political climate reads 9.5/10. Running hot, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10. This is renter territory: 73% of occupied units are tenant-occupied.

The voucher gap is 18.3%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. SNAP participation runs 4.9% against 15.2% nationally. Housing insecurity runs 6.4% against 14.2% nationally.

This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Los Angeles. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. Nationally it ranks #5,730 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 3.1/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.

Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 0.9 points hotter. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured.

Poverty sits at 4%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap. Rent takes 30% or more of income for 56% of renters.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 06037265524

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037265524?

Census tract 06037265524 in the Tehrangeles neighborhood scores 8.4/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06037265524?

Median gross rent is $3,104/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 56% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06037265524?

4.4% of residents in tract 06037265524 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,864.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06037265524?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 23th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 16th, household 25th, minority 57th, housing 38th.
Q5

Is tract 06037265524 considered part of Tehrangeles?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037265524 fall within Tehrangeles (neighborhood centroid within 0.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06037265524 struggle to pay rent?

About 6.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06037265524 compare to Los Angeles overall?

Tract 06037265524 scores 8.4/10, lower than the parent city of Los Angeles at 9.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Los Angeles eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06037265524 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 17% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles

Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related