Westdale Eviction Risk: High , Los Angeles
Tract 06037271400 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 3,266 · neighborhood within 1.1 mi
06037271400 is a census tract in the Westdale area of Los Angeles, CA. It scores 8.4/10 for landlords. 53% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Los Angeles and the region
Centroid at 34.0101, -118.4474 · click any tract to drill in
Why Westdale scores 8.4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Westdale compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 8
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 5%Socioeconomic
- 36%Household composition
- 44%Racial/ethnic minority
- 11%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 15%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Westdale. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 5.7%Housing insecurity
- 2.7%Utility-shutoff threat
- 5.7%Food insecurity
- 4.5%SNAP enrollment
- 3.7%Transit barriers
- 3.1%No health insurance
- 12.0%Frequent mental distress
- 22.2%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Westdale
The score leans hardest on rent-regulation exposure at 10/10. At $3,501 a month, rents run 81% over what the rest of Los Angeles commands.
Sitting well above the midpoint, local political climate reads 9.5/10. Running hot, eviction-process difficulty reads 9.5/10.
The voucher gap is 33.4%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. Food insecurity runs 5.7% against 17.8% nationally.
Housing insecurity runs 5.7% against 14.2% nationally. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. That is riskier than roughly 93% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
Only 12% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. Social vulnerability reads 1.8/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.
Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 0.9 points hotter. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured. Poverty sits at 1%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
About tract 06037271400
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037271400?
What is the average rent in tract 06037271400?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06037271400?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06037271400?
Is tract 06037271400 considered part of Westdale?
What share of households in tract 06037271400 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06037271400 compare to Los Angeles overall?
Was tract 06037271400 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Los Angeles
Top eight tracts in Los Angeles ranked by composite eviction-risk score.