Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #16,571 of 84,120 nationally
La Crescenta Eviction Risk: Elevated , La Crescenta-Montrose
Tract 06037300100 · Los Angeles, CA · pop 6,862 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi
06037300100 is a census tract in the La Crescenta area of La Crescenta-Montrose, CA. It scores 6.3/10 for landlords. Against Los Angeles County at 53.8%, 27% of renters here are cost-burdened.
Risk score
6.3
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 5%
Stable renters 13%
Owners 82%
Tract context
Occupied units2,207
Renter share18.4%
SVI overall0.22
Poverty rate4.7%
Median income$166,716
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
33
th percentile
Low
Within county
14
th percentile
Very Low
Within state
28
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across La Crescenta-Montrose and the region
Centroid at 34.2443, -118.2326 · click any tract to drill in
Why La Crescenta scores 6.3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from La Crescenta-Montrose
7.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.2
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
4.7% poverty · this tract
1.2
Supply constraint
$2,400 rent vs county FMR
4.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from La Crescenta-Montrose
8.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from La Crescenta-Montrose
8.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from La Crescenta-Montrose
5.9
How La Crescenta compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 22
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 13%Socioeconomic
- 79%Household composition
- 66%Racial/ethnic minority
- 8%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 5%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within La Crescenta. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 6.6%Housing insecurity
- 3.0%Utility-shutoff threat
- 7.2%Food insecurity
- 5.6%SNAP enrollment
- 4.3%Transit barriers
- 3.4%No health insurance
- 12.7%Frequent mental distress
- 22.7%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in La Crescenta
The main counterweight is economic stress at 1.2/10. Against the Los Angeles County average of 8.4, this tract reads safer for landlords by 2.1 points.
On the high side, rent-regulation exposure reads 8.4/10. Running hot, tenant-organizing strength reads 8.3/10.
SNAP participation runs 5.6% against 15.2% nationally. Adults with no health insurance runs 3.4% against 11.3% nationally.
This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Los Angeles. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. Nationally it ranks #16,571 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
Only 18% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 3/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.
Rent consumes only 17% of average household income of $166,716, an unusually wide affordability cushion.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 06037300100
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06037300100?
Census tract 06037300100 in the La Crescenta neighborhood scores 6.3/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06037300100?
Median gross rent is $2,400/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 27% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06037300100?
4.7% of residents in tract 06037300100 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,862.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06037300100?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 22th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 13th, household 79th, minority 66th, housing 8th.
Q5
Is tract 06037300100 considered part of La Crescenta?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06037300100 fall within La Crescenta (neighborhood centroid within 1.0 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 06037300100 struggle to pay rent?
About 6.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 06037300100 compare to La Crescenta-Montrose overall?
Tract 06037300100 scores 6.3/10, lower than the parent city of La Crescenta-Montrose at 7.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from La Crescenta-Montrose; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8
Was tract 06037300100 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in La Crescenta-Montrose
Top eight tracts in La Crescenta-Montrose ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related